June 22, 200521 yr its unfair that all the other players get a def bonus and better attcks i agree fire blast is a good cut off for mages seeing as i am one i would know what i am about to say. Non-member mages are at a disadvantage we get hit high with the new arrows and now we cant hardly defend ourselves because we are constantally eating. So this is what i propose, there shoudl be a new mage armor to come out that is avaible to non-members it should be better than robes but not as good as splitbark and should have a def lvl of 20 to use. This should equal out the hit ballance and mages stand more of a chance in a 1v1 fight sure mages have the advantage if its 2v1 but what combat pure dousent its a advantage twice the hits. -thank you for takeing the time to read my post and if u have any suggestions please feel free to poste here or pm min in game rs names: krenbr , paulinmajere
June 22, 200521 yr Non-member mages are at a disadvantage we get hit high with the new arrows and now we cant hardly defend ourselves because we are constantally eating. thats actually how it is supposed to work, the mages are supposed to be killed by archers, but i do like the idea of a mid mage armor, but if jagex does make this, they probably wont make it for f2p Horus was weak, Abbadon was a fool, but I Karkan, chosen of the chaos gods, shall conquer Terra, I shall kill the false emperor. Under my blood stained banner, chaos shall rule the universe
June 23, 200521 yr Did you know that splitbark has little to no range def? Rangers are supposed to own mages anyway.
June 23, 200521 yr I'm a ranger and greenhide is still taking in damage from mages using FB. 85 Def 75 Magic. I know I still destroy mages but I take quite a lot of damage in doing so. The only problem I see with mages are that they get destroyed easy by high level melee. Proud 'The' Guardian KnightCmb F126 - P137 | 99/99 HP | 99/99 Str | 99/99 Atk | 99/99 Def | 99 Range | 99/99 Magic | 99/99 Prayer | 95/99 Summoninghttp://www.theclanrs.com/
June 23, 200521 yr How about we remove Addy arrows are Maple bows? And while we're at it, remove Rune armour for F2P too? That would balance it out. :roll:
June 23, 200521 yr rangers are supposed to own mages, the new arrows was for the purpose of exactly that because they got killed by mages. splitbark could be fine but dont complain on this forum, people just gets angry cause your begging for new updates. R.I.P. Shiva and Steve
June 25, 200521 yr I'm f2p, but the rest of your ignorant f2pers' expect too much out of the free version of the game. You guys just don't get it, if JaGeX creates anything new armor or any kind it's going to go towards members. Just enjoy f2p for a while like me raising my stats until i xfer to p2p...Then you can complain about new armor.
June 25, 200521 yr its true though mages on f2p are having a hard time cos they are at the worst postion. they are at the bottem of the ladder, mages should be able to defeat warriors easy but if the warrior takes of his armor he is no longer as vunrable, rangers have no armor(really) anyway so it not that important but the warriors pretty much own free play, cos of the lack of defences for the other 2, i mean it rune v. mage robes/dragon-hide(a bit better) http://www.uzzisoft..../archimage.jpegWell I knew you wouldn't agree. I know how you hate facing facts.
June 26, 200521 yr Mages are supposed to have difficulty with rangers, that's how JAGeX designed the PKing triangle afterall. Domovoi123-Level 80 f2pNoxious 0ne-Level 46 f2p
June 26, 200521 yr Mages are supposed to have difficulty with rangers, that's how JAGeX designed the PKing triangle afterall. I think he meant the Mages aren't only having trouble with rangers but also with warriors as well. In that case, there is an unbalance, and there needs to be an update no? dude i got pked and lost my full zezima
July 26, 200520 yr Author bump andy thats exactally what i ment mages were once equal and could take at least one of the pures in the traingel but there should really be a new armor
July 26, 200520 yr i dont think u guys need new armor i think u shuld b able to use "snare"...that wuld balance it b/c bind is enoguh to casst bind...cast 1 spell...then egt hit 1-3 times b4 u cast another bind so i think if f2pers got snare...itd b better
July 30, 200520 yr Mages are supposed to have difficulty with rangers, that's how JAGeX designed the PKing triangle afterall. I think he meant the Mages aren't only having trouble with rangers but also with warriors as well. In that case, there is an unbalance, and there needs to be an update no? ya but what he said cant be fixed by an update, cuz warriors will take their armor off to fight mages, and if they did an update to where you have a negative defence without armor on, then they would get flooded by complaints from warriors, what i think that the mages that complain about warriors doing that should do is spend about a week getting their attack and strength up so that when that happens that they can hack the warrior up! :twisted: and when the warrior puts his armor back on, your already one step ahead, all you gotta do is reequip your staff and blast him Horus was weak, Abbadon was a fool, but I Karkan, chosen of the chaos gods, shall conquer Terra, I shall kill the false emperor. Under my blood stained banner, chaos shall rule the universe
July 30, 200520 yr remove Rune armour for F2P too? That would balance it out. :roll: Very bad idea :evil:
July 30, 200520 yr remove Rune armour for F2P too? That would balance it out. :roll: Very bad idea :evil: he was being sarcastic lol :wink:
Create an account or sign in to comment