November 11, 200817 yr I heard that shark were good to start at 85, instead of 94 (the stop burning level with gaunts). So about how many sharks would I possibly burn from 85-94 with the gaunts? Any help is appreciated! ~ Proud Father ~ Proud (Currently Deployed) Army National Guardsmen ~ Proud Lakota ~ Retired Tip.It Crew ~
November 11, 200817 yr umm my friend got 99 cook with gaunts and i think he burnt quite a bit of shars at 85 and also at 88 after that he just waited till 94 when he didnt burn them
November 11, 200817 yr Author umm my friend got 99 cook with gaunts and i think he burnt quite a bit of shars at 85 and also at 88 after that he just waited till 94 when he didnt burn them Ok, unless anyone has anything to contradict that, looks like I'll wait until 94. Thanks! ~ Proud Father ~ Proud (Currently Deployed) Army National Guardsmen ~ Proud Lakota ~ Retired Tip.It Crew ~
November 11, 200817 yr It's best to wait until 94, you'll probably burn a few hundred. ~It's Super Effective! (The Zaaps Blog)~My YouTube Channel, where you get to watch me go around and make a fool out of myself and all comp capersGuides:~Yeah I wrote them once~Suggestions:~Yeah I made those once~
November 11, 200817 yr I agree with everyone else, its best to wait till 94. Though if you have the spare money it might not be a bad idea to get the faster exp sooner. People are probably looking at me like I am a bit nuts right now but think about it. Would the amount of sharks per trip add up to less exp if you used lobs (lobs give you 90 exp less than sharks after cooked) You get a total of 2,520 more exp with sharks per invent (granted you burn zero) That means if you burn more than 12 sharks per load you would be getting the same amount of exp as you would with lobs. I think burning less than 12 per invent is very much possible, it may prove to be worth it. (I know you could of figured all this out for yourself but this was kinda for me too. Dependent on how lucky I get at GWD I may go with sharks all the way. Apparently, my signature was to big.
November 11, 200817 yr Author I agree with everyone else, its best to wait till 94. Though if you have the spare money it might not be a bad idea to get the faster exp sooner. People are probably looking at me like I am a bit nuts right now but think about it. Would the amount of sharks per trip add up to less exp if you used lobs (lobs give you 90 exp less than sharks after cooked) You get a total of 2,520 more exp with sharks per invent (granted you burn zero) That means if you burn more than 12 sharks per load you would be getting the same amount of exp as you would with lobs. I think burning less than 12 per invent is very much possible, it may prove to be worth it. (I know you could of figured all this out for yourself but this was kinda for me too. Dependent on how lucky I get at GWD I may go with sharks all the way. Well it'd be a switch from Swordies to Sharks, and I'm on sort of a tight bugdet. ~ Proud Father ~ Proud (Currently Deployed) Army National Guardsmen ~ Proud Lakota ~ Retired Tip.It Crew ~
November 11, 200817 yr if your on a tight buget id do at 94, expecilly with current prices XBL gamertag: SeismicTriangle
November 12, 200817 yr i would do swordies at 86, the no burn line for swordies. you would actually get faster exp and lose less cash per exp with swordies than lobbies. Raw Swordies-463 Cooked Swordies-411 Raw lobs-332 Cooked lobs-288 120xp for lobs 140xp for swordies 140/(463-411)=2.892xp per gp lost 120/(332-288)=2.727xp per gp lost. I think I'll do Baby Blacks :P
November 12, 200817 yr Author i would do swordies at 86, the no burn line for swordies. you would actually get faster exp and lose less cash per exp with swordies than lobbies. Raw Swordies-463 Cooked Swordies-411 Raw lobs-332 Cooked lobs-288 120xp for lobs 140xp for swordies 140/(463-411)=2.892xp per gp lost 120/(332-288)=2.727xp per gp lost. I'm switching at 81, that's the no burn for swordies with gaunts. ~ Proud Father ~ Proud (Currently Deployed) Army National Guardsmen ~ Proud Lakota ~ Retired Tip.It Crew ~
Create an account or sign in to comment