http://www.onlinegamerscommunity.com/dashandmods/PinkFloyds/Website/Home.htm

 

 

 

(updated occasionaly, if u dont see it i've probably changed the link and haveny updated here yet.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Layout and graphics by me.

 

 

 

coded in Yahoo Pg. Builder 2.2.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lemme know what u think...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no content is available yet, im still working on those pages..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moved - mod edit

Hey LP, I think this belongs in Media Discussion:)

Oops... mods if u get a chance please move this.. thanks

Uh, I see nothing? Although from what I gather from reading the source. I don't think I'm missing much :-?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your background image link is broken aswell so I kind of can't see anything till I select all.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/10 overall. Maybe if the background image worked I might get an idea of how it looks. So I'm just assuming that it'll help the presentation even if the code is shocking,

It's very,... meh.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is way too much going on. The text links are very "meh" and The layout is too complex for a good site. It realy leaves much to desire.

http://www.onlinegamerscommunity.com/dashandmods/PinkFloyds/Website/Home/Home.htm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

made eveything myself..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

html, images, EVERYTHING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lemme know what u think...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no links are available yet, im still working on those pages..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

looks alright, not too sure what's it's about... meh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

oh and at the bottom, it says

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâé 2005-2006 Adam Svoboda, All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

No portions of The Machine may be used without expressed, written permission.

 

 

 

Layout and Content Created by: Adam Svoboda, and Travis Kaiser

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

so much for doing it all by urself, lol.

im designing it... hes just creating WRITTEN content...

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1 ... site/Home/

 

 

 

If you don't have any idea what the above means, please stop coding webdesigns. Now.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Did you just say 'all by yourself'? I mean, I'm used to people discluding notepad, editplus, emeditor or textpad if they say 'all by myself'. But this is something different...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  ns4 = document.layers && true;



 msie = document.all && true;



 function init() {



 }

 

 

 

Useless javascript, badly coded javascript.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

...

 

 

 

Ugh. Just ugh.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forums

 

 

 

It's so great if people have no idea how html works. Also, go easy on people editing the code. A newline doesn't kill you, you know. Let's try that again:

 

 

 

In head:











Forums

 

 

 

Much nicer than the tag soup you're using.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, as pointed out by rick, your bg image doesn't work, at least not in IE, and as rick says it doesn't work, it probably doesn't work in Opera either.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And you're using a TABLE LAYOUT. This is the year 2005. You should use a

layout or no layout at all, or at least put up a big sign explaining why you just 'had' to use a table layout (I can't think of any valid reason - if you're already 'fixing' a table layout in IE, surely 'fixing' floating divs wouldn't require too much more effort. Tables are for tabular data, not for design. Damnit...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last but not least, use an external css. Please. And kill all your 'style=...' attribs.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH riddles!? seriously i didnt understand a word of that Hannibal but my view is: if he doesnt understandwhat that means in that link, he could learn? not stop? learn?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and if coding works.. it just works, why make it look better..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and rick.. why rate it if you cant see it?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

theres to much going on in the design, try something more relaxed :wink:

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH riddles!? seriously i didnt understand a word of that Hannibal but my view is: if he doesnt understandwhat that means in that link, he could learn? not stop? learn?

 

 

 

Fine by me, but usually people who make these sites are reluctant to learn, thinking they already know it all, and 'it just works'. It doesn't. It works in your browser, because it's trying hard to cope with all the crap you throw at it. People have come to expect that. It's the webdesigner's responsibility to make a page accessible to everyone, not just to people who have a good browser. Hey, we've got to take care of IE as well, don't we? :)

 

 

 

So errm, you didn't understand the link. The link didn't like the topic starter's page. If it did, it'd look something like this: http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1 ... /projects/

 

 

 

That's a lot easier, right?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and if coding works.. it just works, why make it look better..

 

 

 

Because it's slower this way, it uses up more bandwidth, it's slower to render, it may not get rendered correctly by your browser because it's such a mess, and it doesn't 'just work' - rick couldn't even view the site!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and rick.. why rate it if you cant see it?

 

 

 

If you'd read everything he said, you'd know that he'd seen the HTML. Which sucks. So that's a very good reason to rate a website like that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, I think it's rather weird you understand a rather complicated site like this (forum) and were not able to find the help link at the top of the page:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://validator.w3.org/docs/help.html#clickedandlost

its not very hard to code because even i can do it. look at tutorials and ask poeple for help because poeple are normally willing to help you code. before i didnt used to care about code but now its my top priority.