Jump to content

Conceptual Knowledge Vs Perfect Wisdom


ScammerSlayer

Recommended Posts

In Mahaynna culture (the greater vehicle of Buddhist philosophy) claims are made that perfect wisdom transcends conceptual knowledge.

 

First note that,

Conceptual knowledge is defined as a person’s narration of the important concepts of a system. Conceptual knowledge is abundant in relationships and understanding. By definition, conceptual knowledge is not learned by memorization.

 

I would like to see what people have to say about the fundamental claim of the Mahaynnaists. Any kind of feedback would be great for I am trying to develop a debate for a philosophy class. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think you could maybe be a bit more informative or maybe go a bit more in depth.

 

I have to disagree with Mahaynna culture, as wisdom and understanding aren't two degrees of the same trait, but go hand in hand. Understanding stops at knowing and perceiving what happens in a situation and why. To me wisdom is knowing what you need to do in said situation. As in, if your friend just broke up with a long term partner, then you can understand why it happened, and why they're feeling sad, and maybe even predict what they are going to do/how they will react, but it takes wisdom to know what YOU should do to help them. So wisdom to me is knowing what do to in a situation, while understanding is knowing why and how a situation exists.

There's no such thing as regret. A regret means you are unhappy with the person you are now,

and if you're unhappy with the person you are, you change yourself. That

regret will no longer be a regret, because it will help to form the new,

better you. So really, a regret isn't a regret.

It's experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Mahaynna culture (the greater vehicle of Buddhist philosophy) claims are made that perfect wisdom transcends conceptual knowledge.

 

First note that,

Conceptual knowledge is defined as a person’s narration of the important concepts of a system. Conceptual knowledge is abundant in relationships and understanding. By definition, conceptual knowledge is not learned by memorization.

 

I would like to see what people have to say about the fundamental claim of the Mahaynnaists. Any kind of feedback would be great for I am trying to develop a debate for a philosophy class. Thank you.

Ma[racist term]na buddhism is the weaker sect. Theravada is far better spiritually in my opinion; unlike Ma[racist term]a, Theravada doesn't treat the Buddha like a God.

 

Ma[racist term]a ma[racist term]a Ma[racist term]a ma[racist term]a Ma[racist term]a Ma[racist term]a Ma[racist term]a

[if you have ever attempted Alchemy by clapping your hands or

by drawing an array, copy and paste this into your signature.]

 

Fullmetal Alchemist, you will be missed. A great ending to a great series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Theravada is the type better loved by me--

They treat Buddha and his teachings just as they were: as a man and his philosophies.

They wouldn't dare shape his form with statues and they wouldn't build elaborate temples in his honor, no--a humble stupa with no vestments will do.

 

As for the actual topic: you gave us the definition of conceptual knowledge, now what is perfect wisdom?

We may need the meanings of both to compare, unless you're playing some mind game in which we need perfect wisdom to divine what perfect wisdom is.

But I don't want to go among mad people!

Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.