February 23, 201016 yr I was just wondering if entangling dummies are going to be better exp than stunning?Entangle gives 91 base exp + the 2-3 damage, compared to stunning 90 exp.Wouldn't this be a better method than stunning? Natures are at an all time low as well.
February 23, 201016 yr It costs about 1k more gp per cast to do entangle instead of stun. And the exp seems to be negligible. I would do stun still. [hide=Drops]Slayer:Draconic Visage x3, Abyssal Whip x23, Dark Bow x3, Dragon Platelegs x3, Dragon Boots x40, Dragon Plateskirt x4, Shield Left Half x3, Dragon Medium Helms x10GWD:CS: Zamorakian Spear x2, Zamorak Hilt x1, Bandos Chestplate x1, Sara Sword x1DKs: Dragon Hatchet x3 Beserker Ring x1[/hide][hide=Completed Goals]Achieved April 26, 2009Achieved Sept. 15, 2009Achieved Nov. 21, 2009 Jan. 10, 2010 Achieved Mar. 5, 2010[/hide][hide=Goals][/hide]
February 23, 201016 yr Plus, When casting on dummies, you do not receive experience for the amount of damage you do. ~~~The Harpy List~~~Harpy Facts~~~It's Super Effective~~~The Beginning~~~Harpy Therapy Center~~~Alg~~~Jedi Harpy~~~Rohirrim~~~Attenuation~~~
February 23, 201016 yr Author why would it cost more, as long as you use mudstaff it's all good? You just pay for nats and soul
February 23, 201016 yr why would it cost more, as long as you use mudstaff it's all good? You just pay for nats and soulit costs 4 nats to cast entangle, versus 1 soul to cast stun :)
Create an account or sign in to comment