ryanstinks Posted June 15, 2010 Share Posted June 15, 2010 in the dungeoneering skills guide it says high alch in dungeoneering gives 65 xp, So i figured that would be an amazing way to earn magic xp. went in to do it and i didnt look at the exact xp it gave but it was only a couple or a few xp per cast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nukearcher Posted June 15, 2010 Share Posted June 15, 2010 yea i noticed that too its like /10 the exp you get there. humidy gives right exp thought Ranged 101/99, Str 105/99, Att 105/99, Hp 106/99, Def 100/70, Magic 102/99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romy Posted June 15, 2010 Share Posted June 15, 2010 Moving to Website Updates & Corrections. ~Romy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxingmck Posted June 15, 2010 Share Posted June 15, 2010 shared xp? Noobs: We pay we sayJaGeX: How much will you pay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Posted June 16, 2010 Share Posted June 16, 2010 Have you checked it with and without Shared XP like mentioned? Popoto.~<3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
De_Ares Posted June 16, 2010 Share Posted June 16, 2010 hmmm the xp is a bit weird in dungeons i dont quite understand it =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aws_137 Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 You get 6.5 exp and 3.1 exp for High Alch and Low Alch respectively in dungeons - all to avoid exploitation of lvling in dungeons. That's 1/10 of the normal exp, with or without Shared XP (it doesn't work for spells). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaaps1 Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Shared xp only applies to things like skill doors. Basic actions do not get it. ~It's Super Effective! (The Zaaps Blog)~My YouTube Channel, where you get to watch me go around and make a fool out of myself and all comp capersGuides:~Yeah I wrote them once~Suggestions:~Yeah I made those once~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codguy Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 Thanks for submitting this mistake in our guide. I apologize for the delay in getting to this thread! You are indeed correct, and I have confirmed that aws_137 is correct with the numbers posted. I've credited you both for this correction. Thanks. If you have anything else, please feel free to PM me or any other Crew member. -Codguy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts