Agriculture is the dominant industry in almost all developing countries so it is only natural for it to be considered as crucial for economic development. It can be seem as a springboard into other industries and economic diversity. Agricultural resources in most countries are readily available and require little if no monetary input to begin with. However a âââ¬Ãâstructural transformationâââ¬Ã

Did you post all that just to educate us or did I miss the point?

That is my first college paper ever.

 

 

 

I didn't intend you to read that, I was just making a really long freepost.

Well I found it interesting and educational, what more can you ask? Well done.

We will still ne cereals for quite a long time. As the world's average GNP increases, cereal farming will become less used. This will drive up the price of cereals. This will make them lucrative once more and then we will farm them again. In "service sector Britain", agriculture is at an all time low - but if it become lucrative it will rise.

 

 

 

p.s. i Didn't read entire post only conclusion as I am going to bed.

 

 

 

Edit: before I go I just want to point out that the distribution of wealth can become more even, but the world cannot actualy get richer, per se, as richness and currency is relative.

** YAWN ** ** SNORE ** ** BORE ** ** DROOL ** ** HURL **

 

 

 

Gatorboy428

^you are stupid =)

^you are stupid =)

 

 

 

And it's safe to say that I agree with you for once. :P

^you are stupid =)

 

 

 

And it's safe to say that I agree with you for once. :P

I agree.

 

 

 

And I know nothing about anything that you wrote about but I still read the whole thing and it sounds impressive to me at least.