August 5, 200619 yr It's pretty bizarre, but it made me chuckle a few times. ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâï(ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâú_o)/ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâï
August 5, 200619 yr IS AT&T and whatnot seriously trying to do this? I've heard nothing of it. The popularity of any given religion today depends on the victories of the wars they fought in the past. - Me!
August 5, 200619 yr i need a hug... come here mister tree not everybody wants to hear the bubblegum pop garbage.im gonna burn in hell and drink all of satans beer.trashmetal/deathmetal/hardrock/folkmetal die hard
August 5, 200619 yr net nutrality is a complicated issue for me, im not sure where i stand on it. the opening part was wrong through, it wouldnt control what you can see.
August 7, 200619 yr I'm interested, what would change if the neutralisation happened? Thanks Venomai for this super sig and Kwimbob for the awesome avatar!
August 7, 200619 yr Always a good laugh. :P Until websites that you enjoy to visit are slower to download, or are not available to you.
August 7, 200619 yr I'm interested, what would change if the neutralisation happened? Under the plans they are considering, all of us--from content providers to individual users--would pay more to surf online, stream videos or even send e-mail. Industry planners are mulling new subscription plans that would further limit the online experience, establishing "platinum," "gold" and "silver" levels of Internet access that would set limits on the number of downloads, media streams or even e-mail messages that could be sent or received. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/030206endofinternet.htm
Create an account or sign in to comment