ddaanniiellh Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 I completely support this Comparing to some of my member friends, I have double the xp they have but, their total level rank is over 100,000-200,000 ahead of mine :shock: . ~Ddaanniiellh : 1437 : 173Lowest Combat to 1,000 Total in F2P (23 Combat)Check me out on YouTube! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caligula101 Posted February 2, 2007 Author Share Posted February 2, 2007 Point taken Stihl, however remember that that is still the case with the current hiscores, levels such as cooking are easier to get levels in. But you already said that so you stole my comeback! Your name has been added and spelt correctly!Thanks everyone for the support keep it coming in! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorry Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 Yea I think ranking by xp is way better, because it represents the time and energy put in your account much closer then total lvl, altough not flawless, as some skills are easier to lvl, but total lvl is very stupid to rank on, as people with mediocre lvls in all stats pass people with some brilliant stats in hiscores but they have put 10 times less work in it. Sign me up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unkn0wnwarrior Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 I would like to see this added. That way, I could see how I stack up against some of you members in exp, instead of just total levels. Sign me up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anantipure Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 Support! Great Idea! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now