____ Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 Has anyone else been a bit "meah" over the series so far? After the ENG vs NZ last week, I pretty much gave up watching... Like I wasn't exactly watching anyways after Englands humiliations in the Ashes so I didn't have high hopes for improved performance for the Tri-Series, this game proved it... England v New Zealand Tri-Series Venue: Adelaide Toss: New Zealand New Zealand S Fleming c Nixon b Flintoff 20 N Astle c Collingwood b Anderson 1 P Fulton c Collingwood b Lewis 24 R Taylor c Collingwood b Panesar 15 C McMillan lbw Collingwood 2 J Oram c Strauss b Anderson 86 B McCullum b Flintoff 30 J Franklin run out 14 D Vettori c Nixon b Flintoff 2 S Bond b Flintoff2 M Gillespie not out 1 Extras: (b2 lb3 w6 nb2) 13 Total: (all out 50 overs) 210 Falls: 1-5, 2-37, 3-55, 4-61, 5-67, 6-187, 7-191, 8-194, 9-196, 10-210. Bowling: Lewis 10-1-31-1 (1w 2nb), Anderson 10-2-47-2 (2w), Flintoff 10-2-21-4 (1w), Collingwood 8-0-40-1, Panesar 9-0-44-1, Dalrymple 3-0-22-0 (2w). England A Strauss lbw Franklin 19 M Loye c Fleming b Franklin 8 I Bell c Fleming b Franklin 2 E Joyce c Gillespie b Vettori 47 P Collingwood lbw Vettori 10 A Flintoff c McCullum b Vettori 9 P Nixon c McCullum b Oram 6 J Dalrymple c Fleming b Vettori 0 J Lewis c Fleming b Bond 5 M Panesar c Astle b Bond 6 J Anderson not out 0 Extras: (lb5 w1 nb2) 8 Total: (all out, 37.5 overs) 120 Falls: 1-21, 2-30, 3-31, 4-76, 5-92, 6-107, 7-107, 8-107, 9-120, 10-120. Bowling: Franklin 7-2-17-3 (2nb), Bond 9.5-1-32-2 (1w), Gillespie 5-2-25-0, Oram 7-1-17-1, Vettori 9-0-24-4. Result: New Zealand won by 90 runs England is meant to be the second best team in the world, and they were beaten (easily) by New Zealand, which is essentially at the bottom of the ladder. The entire cricket season to date has been a disapointment due to Englands hopeless performance. I almost feel sorry for anyone who's purchances tickets to any games where England is playing :-? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warri0r45 Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 Has anyone else been a bit "meah" over the series so far? After the ENG vs NZ last week, I pretty much gave up watching... Like I wasn't exactly watching anyways after Englands humiliations in the Ashes so I didn't have high hopes for improved performance for the Tri-Series, this game proved it... England v New Zealand Tri-Series Venue: Adelaide Toss: New Zealand New Zealand S Fleming c Nixon b Flintoff 20 N Astle c Collingwood b Anderson 1 P Fulton c Collingwood b Lewis 24 R Taylor c Collingwood b Panesar 15 C McMillan lbw Collingwood 2 J Oram c Strauss b Anderson 86 B McCullum b Flintoff 30 J Franklin run out 14 D Vettori c Nixon b Flintoff 2 S Bond b Flintoff2 M Gillespie not out 1 Extras: (b2 lb3 w6 nb2) 13 Total: (all out 50 overs) 210 Falls: 1-5, 2-37, 3-55, 4-61, 5-67, 6-187, 7-191, 8-194, 9-196, 10-210. Bowling: Lewis 10-1-31-1 (1w 2nb), Anderson 10-2-47-2 (2w), Flintoff 10-2-21-4 (1w), Collingwood 8-0-40-1, Panesar 9-0-44-1, Dalrymple 3-0-22-0 (2w). England A Strauss lbw Franklin 19 M Loye c Fleming b Franklin 8 I Bell c Fleming b Franklin 2 E Joyce c Gillespie b Vettori 47 P Collingwood lbw Vettori 10 A Flintoff c McCullum b Vettori 9 P Nixon c McCullum b Oram 6 J Dalrymple c Fleming b Vettori 0 J Lewis c Fleming b Bond 5 M Panesar c Astle b Bond 6 J Anderson not out 0 Extras: (lb5 w1 nb2) 8 Total: (all out, 37.5 overs) 120 Falls: 1-21, 2-30, 3-31, 4-76, 5-92, 6-107, 7-107, 8-107, 9-120, 10-120. Bowling: Franklin 7-2-17-3 (2nb), Bond 9.5-1-32-2 (1w), Gillespie 5-2-25-0, Oram 7-1-17-1, Vettori 9-0-24-4. Result: New Zealand won by 90 runs England is meant to be the second best team in the world, and they were beaten (easily) by New Zealand, which is essentially at the bottom of the ladder. The entire cricket season to date has been a disapointment due to Englands hopeless performance. I almost feel sorry for anyone who's purchances tickets to any games where England is playing :-? Haha, I went to the ODI Aus vs Eng at the Gabba which was more of a contest than the majority of matches Aus vs Eng over the summer. The ODI being played right now is a ripper. Eng set 291 or so and Aus were 2 down after the second over! :ohnoes: Forgive me, Eng scored 293. :lol: Must have been all the beer I've been drinking. =P~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____ Posted February 2, 2007 Author Share Posted February 2, 2007 Yea, todays match is perhaps the only time I've felt there's been any fight from the England side all summer :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 England are only the 2nd best team in the world "supposedly" in Test Cricket. Their 3rd last in the standing for ODI's only being ahead of Zimbabwe and Kenya I think from memory. Its definitely a contest today (thank God). Gilchrist got an awesome ball first up and is out as well as Hodge. Looking forward to when Symonds gets in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warri0r45 Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 England are only the 2nd best team in the world "supposedly" in Test Cricket. Their 3rd last in the standing for ODI's only being ahead of Zimbabwe and Kenya I think from memory. Its definitely a contest today (thank God). Gilchrist got an awesome ball first up and is out as well as Hodge. Looking forward to when Symonds gets in. That ball was reminiscant of Hoggard vs. Langer at Perth I think it was in the test match. Absolute ripper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____ Posted February 2, 2007 Author Share Posted February 2, 2007 England are only the 2nd best team in the world "supposedly" in Test Cricket. Their 3rd last in the standing for ODI's only being ahead of Zimbabwe and Kenya I think from memory.Test cricket yes, but their ODI performance is well below what they usually achieve. Like bottom of the ladder low. Its definitely a contest today (thank God). Gilchrist got an awesome ball first up and is out as well as Hodge. Looking forward to when Symonds gets in.This I can agree with. Although the "have to win to have any shot a the final" has me thinking it's the only reason there's any fight to this game :-? It's the first real resistance they've shown since Adelaide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warri0r45 Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 I hate to say it, but somehow I think England will beat us for the first time this summer... I was beginning to think it was impossible. :shock: :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 I hate to say it, but somehow I think England will beat us for the first time this summer... I was beginning to think it was impossible. :shock: :lol: Yeah same. Ah well we gotta give them some confidence for the future! ...Actually on 2nd thoughts. :P :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____ Posted February 2, 2007 Author Share Posted February 2, 2007 After this summer - if that team walks away with half of them coming back, i'll be impressed :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fitzztif Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 Hopefully Symonds isn't too badly injured :cry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____ Posted February 2, 2007 Author Share Posted February 2, 2007 Hopefully Symonds isn't too badly injured :cry:Comon, the guys a tank - he'll be right after a few beers and some steak : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 Hopefully Symonds isn't too badly injured :cry:Comon, the guys a tank - he'll be right after a few beers and some steak : :lol: Ah, We lost. Oh well. So they should be an under-strengthened Australian Side eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubsa Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 We have our moments, but I'm sure the England team feels exactly the same as all other Englishmen right about now: Can't be arsed. This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warri0r45 Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 What a win for Ricky and the boys! The captain with a century and Brad Hodge with 99* This one was more of a :ohnoes: . :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lotuslord212 Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Has anyone else been a bit "meah" over the series so far? After the ENG vs NZ last week, I pretty much gave up watching... Like I wasn't exactly watching anyways after Englands humiliations in the Ashes so I didn't have high hopes for improved performance for the Tri-Series, this game proved it... England v New Zealand Tri-Series Venue: Adelaide Toss: New Zealand New Zealand S Fleming c Nixon b Flintoff 20 N Astle c Collingwood b Anderson 1 P Fulton c Collingwood b Lewis 24 R Taylor c Collingwood b Panesar 15 C McMillan lbw Collingwood 2 J Oram c Strauss b Anderson 86 B McCullum b Flintoff 30 J Franklin run out 14 D Vettori c Nixon b Flintoff 2 S Bond b Flintoff2 M Gillespie not out 1 Extras: (b2 lb3 w6 nb2) 13 Total: (all out 50 overs) 210 Falls: 1-5, 2-37, 3-55, 4-61, 5-67, 6-187, 7-191, 8-194, 9-196, 10-210. Bowling: Lewis 10-1-31-1 (1w 2nb), Anderson 10-2-47-2 (2w), Flintoff 10-2-21-4 (1w), Collingwood 8-0-40-1, Panesar 9-0-44-1, Dalrymple 3-0-22-0 (2w). England A Strauss lbw Franklin 19 M Loye c Fleming b Franklin 8 I Bell c Fleming b Franklin 2 E Joyce c Gillespie b Vettori 47 P Collingwood lbw Vettori 10 A Flintoff c McCullum b Vettori 9 P Nixon c McCullum b Oram 6 J Dalrymple c Fleming b Vettori 0 J Lewis c Fleming b Bond 5 M Panesar c Astle b Bond 6 J Anderson not out 0 Extras: (lb5 w1 nb2) 8 Total: (all out, 37.5 overs) 120 Falls: 1-21, 2-30, 3-31, 4-76, 5-92, 6-107, 7-107, 8-107, 9-120, 10-120. Bowling: Franklin 7-2-17-3 (2nb), Bond 9.5-1-32-2 (1w), Gillespie 5-2-25-0, Oram 7-1-17-1, Vettori 9-0-24-4. Result: New Zealand won by 90 runs England is meant to be the second best team in the world, and they were beaten (easily) by New Zealand, which is essentially at the bottom of the ladder. The entire cricket season to date has been a disapointment due to Englands hopeless performance. I almost feel sorry for anyone who's purchances tickets to any games where England is playing :-? First, England is only second best in this years because it played too much again Nz and AS.....It is like I think 8th in ODI ( which is much more better than Test)...nad ya ur right they had a noob perfomance this year.! 1 Australia 135 2 England 114 3 Pakistan 108 4 India 107 5 Sri Lanka 102 6 South Africa 102 7 New Zealand 93 8 West Indies 72 9 Zimbabwe 28 10 Bangladesh 2 Complete Rankings ÃÆââ¬Å¡ÃâûONE DAYS>>. 1 Australia 133 2 South Africa 126 3 Pakistan 112 4 New Zealand 110 5 Sri Lanka 109 6 India 108 7 West Indies 101 8 England 99 9 Bangladesh 41 10 Zimbabwe 23 11 Kenya 0 ????ClAn????wHaT iS iT??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____ Posted February 4, 2007 Author Share Posted February 4, 2007 I'm not a fan of the ODI ladder since teams like India, Sri Lanka and South Africa play teams like Kenya, Zimbabew and Bangladesh enough times to get their points up there. Call my synical; but when the only teams you play are generally crap - logically you'll have higher points than those who don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warri0r45 Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 I'm not a fan of the ODI ladder since teams like India, Sri Lanka and South Africa play teams like Kenya, Zimbabew and Bangladesh enough times to get their points up there. Call my synical; but when the only teams you play are generally crap - logically you'll have higher points than those who don't. They still can't even catch up to us. :D :notalk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lotuslord212 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 I'm not a fan of the ODI ladder since teams like India, Sri Lanka and South Africa play teams like Kenya, Zimbabew and Bangladesh enough times to get their points up there. Call my synical; but when the only teams you play are generally crap - logically you'll have higher points than those who don't. They still can't even catch up to us. :D :notalk: Heloo why u framing India?? For Australia, every country is sucky!! So you mean they do it toget their point up right?? plus, India, Srilanka and South Africa; specially SA and INd can beat Australia. So dont even talk.....and be rasis for those ppl..... (excuse my spelling please?) ????ClAn????wHaT iS iT??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lotuslord212 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 I'm not a fan of the ODI ladder since teams like India, Sri Lanka and South Africa play teams like Kenya, Zimbabew and Bangladesh enough times to get their points up there. Call my synical; but when the only teams you play are generally crap - logically you'll have higher points than those who don't. Oh my dear friend, they do not count the points way u thinking of..... you might want to check ICC website and then post it again!! :wall: ????ClAn????wHaT iS iT??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viktorkrum77 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 Cricket's just a bunch of skinny men with bad teeth. :P I am joking BTW... Me doing staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lotuslord212 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 Cricket's just a bunch of skinny men with bad teeth. :P I am joking BTW... yeah!! but still better!! ILOVEIT BTW they are juss like you!! lol ????ClAn????wHaT iS iT??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warri0r45 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 I'm not a fan of the ODI ladder since teams like India, Sri Lanka and South Africa play teams like Kenya, Zimbabew and Bangladesh enough times to get their points up there. Call my synical; but when the only teams you play are generally crap - logically you'll have higher points than those who don't. They still can't even catch up to us. :D :notalk: Heloo why u framing India?? For Australia, every country is sucky!! So you mean they do it toget their point up right?? plus, India, Srilanka and South Africa; specially SA and INd can beat Australia. So dont even talk.....and be rasis for those ppl..... (excuse my spelling please?) What on earth are you trying to say? :-s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____ Posted February 6, 2007 Author Share Posted February 6, 2007 Oh my dear friend, they do not count the points way u thinking of.....How am I thinking? you might want to check ICC website and then post it again!!I know how the point system works. Difference in points effects how many you get for a win, and how many are taken for a loss. It's fairly simple to "break away" when you play teams with performance standards under what you normaly play (ie: Australia and South Africa). Sure the bottom 3 are almost 60 points behind Englnand, but that doesn't mean they still don't make for cheap points at point stage for most of the "middle order". Which is my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lotuslord212 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 Oh my dear friend, they do not count the points way u thinking of.....How am I thinking? you might want to check ICC website and then post it again!!I know how the point system works. Difference in points effects how many you get for a win, and how many are taken for a loss. It's fairly simple to "break away" when you play teams with performance standards under what you normaly play (ie: Australia and South Africa). Sure the bottom 3 are almost 60 points behind Englnand, but that doesn't mean they still don't make for cheap points at point stage for most of the "middle order". Which is my point. Watever............ ????ClAn????wHaT iS iT??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____ Posted February 6, 2007 Author Share Posted February 6, 2007 And after you were so certain you were correct - you're just going to walk away without proving me wrong? Ok then :uhh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now