Jump to content

Locutus_Of_Borg

Members
  • Content Count

    551
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Locutus_Of_Borg

  • Rank
    Scorpion Pit

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Utah

RuneScape Information

  1. How is it bad? There is a place for that sort of thing, hence its title 'Clan Wars.' How would a 99% PvP world even regulate the rules used in clan wars? The only difference is if you would want to have a war right outside of Lumbridge, at which point you have nothing to compare previous clan wars to. yeah but clan wars doesnt give you the adrenaline that old Pk'ing used to. when i Pk'ed (which wasnt often) my body froze, dunno why, but the immense amount of adrenaline in me. clan wars; its just run in, kill, insult the opposing team with "scarred" threats and walk off. sure PK you got pathetic oe-liners like "nice try noob", "what a noob", or "No prayer!". but its the adrenaline that SHOULD be given back to F2P since they too lost the old PK. The rush was from knowing you're risking your gear for something else. Turn on Items Lost On Death. The difference between having a clan war in the old level 30 wilderness and Clan Wars is that you can't run from a Clan War but still lose your items if you die. It's not longer as simple as "run in, kill, insult the opposing team". It's run in, try not to die, and then later try to rebuy gear your clan mates lost. And the FFA portals, they are built almost EXACTLY in the same fashion as the old Wilderness, just without a level system. Could you tell me in a nutshell exactly how old clan wars used to be compared to clan wars now with the ability to enforce rules.
  2. Sure, they lose POTENTIAL ad money, but it wouldn't leave Jagex worse off than they are now. All they have to risk is gaining potential subscription money. The original what is better, original joke?
  3. How is it bad? There is a place for that sort of thing, hence its title 'Clan Wars.' How would a 99% PvP world even regulate the rules used in clan wars? The only difference is if you would want to have a war right outside of Lumbridge, at which point you have nothing to compare previous clan wars to.
  4. If they were here for only PvP, wouldn't they have quit, say, 9 months ago? I did, and came back for PvP. The people I've talked to in BH all say they are just killing time/practicing for the pvp servers. But you see, if the supposed 10% left 9 months ago, came back this month and then left again, wouldn't we pretty much end up where we are now with that supposed 10% still gone today?
  5. OMG lol can i put tht in my siggy? Go right on ahead :D
  6. If they were here for only PvP, wouldn't they have quit, say, 9 months ago?
  7. So, say in a hypothetical situation 90% of F2P subscribed. Are you insinuating that it would be a bad thing since 90% of the ad money goes with them? In that sense, it's actually a bad thing to try to convince people to subscribe to the game? I don't see how more people paying Jagex has a negative effect on their business.
  8. You know what's ironic? The Nazis were defeated in WW2 but there are still Pro-Nazi groups out there. Why should we have even bothered fighting in WW2 if we didn't completely remove the Nazis from the planet...
  9. It's not very rare, it happens quite often. Whenever it says "Your dagger finds a [racist term] in the armor," that's when the effect has occurred. EDIT: Interesting, that word is censored....
  10. I'm sure they've got the ignoring thing down to a science. RuneScapers complain every time there's any update. How many RuneScapers does it take to change a lightbulb? 10,001 1 to change the lightbulb. 10,000 to whine about changing it back.
  11. Wouldn't making the PvP Worlds Members only be a very good incentive to subscribe? I think it'd be a very smooth business plan.
  12. I've got to type this quick so it won't be as aesthetic or provoking as I want to it be at the moment. I'll update it as soon as it gets rolling. When I first read the update about PvP Worlds a while back, I was, like most people, excited at the prospect of a new, enormous PvP update. School had started up and I decided not to resubscribe my membership and let it run out. Even though I'm no longer a member, I have hoped that the PvP worlds would be P2P. It's a great incentive for people to subscribe. Although, I do know that if it were implemented as such, there would be many rants as to how F2P who used to have access to the old Wilderness PKing would be left out, pure accounts made on F2P not being able to be used, etc. This thread is to discuss the Positive and Negative impacts of having PvP Worlds being only P2P and/or F2P.
  13. Way to completely contradict yourself there.
  14. When I read this, I thought he was just being a stupid moron trying to "trick" people into trying to repeat the glitch by losing all their stuff in BH. Then I saw Laikrob's post and changed my mind.
  15. I house hug like 1/4 the game and then tank in the middle because... I win anyways and the game ends faster? Only time I actually need to try to win is against like 120s+. People trying to get magic xp are awesome because I max out charges and get a ton of rank and tokens.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.