HAHAHAHA! :lol: Thanks, you made my day... do you realise that you have to have a female chicken (a hen) and a male chicken (a rooster) to be able to have chicks? There is no "embryo's" inside it unless its fertilised. I know ill probably get flamed for it and no, im not an expert on the matter, but yesterday on some documentary i saw, it explanded the thing out. Basically, the reason why i opposed to it is this: The embryo is a life form, think of it,as if its lying dormant for it to be transported to a woman. This has the potential then to make a child. I know that this research could possibly cure diseases such as diabeties (my mum actually has diabities, so dont try and say that your some hippy that doesnt know what its like to live with someone with a debilitating disease.) The whole point is this. YOUR KILLING INNOCENT PEOPLE. What if an embryo had the potential to be your sister, your brother or your best friend? what if it were to be the next mother teresa, van gough or michael Jackson (actually, bad example :uhh: ) but do you see my point? ITS NOT SCIENTISTS RIGHT TO PLAY GOD! and decide who lives and who dies and who has the chance of living. BTW killing innocent lives is wrong, especially before they try every option with adult stem cells, because the medical feild can use adult cells, and they are having massive break throughs with this, their claim is that the embroyonic cellsare easier to structure with the cells. (thanks for reading my point of veiw, ill get flamed... i dont care, this is my opinion and im intitled to it, just like your intitled to yours. Sorry if there are any spelling or gramatical errors, btw, i probably spelt embryo wrong, but oh well)