18godzilla

1) The Runescape Filter! Let it filter the worst words... but come'on enough is enough. What the hell kind of game doesn't let you say crap? 2) Anyone under 13 3) Anyone who would kill their own mother for a few gps (about 50% of runescape fits in to this category) 4) Anyone who says "Press 11111, looking for a hawt bf!" Or anything similar.

I am not sure about that whole Jagex losing money thing you said. I am not 100% sure but I do believe that thoes adverts on the F2p page of Runescape as well as the adverts on Runescape over all, pay Jagex. This is said under rule #14 on the Runescape rules. Even if they are making a lot of money on adverts, it still costs them money every time you play.

If you can't afford $5.00 dollars a month, and you've been playing Runescape to the extent that you need more bank space, I really think you need a Job. Not Enough Money + Playing Runescape too Much = Get a Job Seriously though, you think they make so much money on ads? They don't, how often do you click the ads? Runescape LOSES money when you play. Every time you log on you are draining their money. You would piss yourself if you knew how much they pay to rent those servers. Who the hell keeps a frog mask or prince clothes anyways?

You're just jealous because your defence is lower then 99

Wow, people can't take a joke... erm.. I mean, he was removed from the highscores because he kept winning to much.

Because i have strategy!

I have created the first successful pure defence staker. Please read my whole thread before you jump to any conclusion. Firstly, here is my build. Took approximately 6 months to finish. The 99 defence makes it virtually impossible for the enemy to hit anything, giving me the advantage in every duel. Here is a regular duel inventory for me. I start with full iron on and a steel battle axe, then at the last moment I quickly switch to full rune to throw them off. They never see it coming and fail to hit their final hits... leading to my victory. I also use a Super Defence Potion if drinks are on. And the steel 2h is used when the enemy is low on health. I whip it out and and hit a 4 to finish them off. I've had a lot of success dueling, and recently I started taking screenshots. My combat is 56 but I can win against much higher levels. Here is a stake I won from a level 80. And a few days ago I had the opportunity to battle Zezima. Check it out. More screen shots to come soon. If anyone wants advice on creating a defence pure I am happy to help. Comments/Criticism/Suggestions are welcome =].

Wow! I support. Very nice!

My response to previous posts. Apologies if I am taking the thread off-topic: Your point make sense. But even if that one argument is not valid is does not say anything. And I'm sure I could dig up some sites that rebutt that. My point is that its not Science versus Religion. Religion also has science backing it up, and there are many Christian scientists. People assume that the science which makes their gameboys and cellphones work is the same science that proves evolution. But evolution is not entirely proved, neither is the age of the earth. Nowhere will you find the law of evolution. The Bible is an amazing book - written by many authors over a long time period. Never does it contradict itself. Even today we are finding that cities and people written about in the Bible really existed. Many have died in the name of Jesus, and if God and Jesus are just a hoax, I would find it hard to believe that the ones who created it would also die for it. Once again, I will let this site speak for me: Living penguins have been carbon dated and the results said that they had died 8,000 years ago! This is just one of many inaccurate dates given by Carbon dating. And again Shells from living snails were once dated using the Carbon 14 method. The results stated that the snails had died 27,000 years ago. (Science vol. 224 1984 pg. 58-61)

It also used to be PROVEN that the earth flat. There is no real proof that the earth is 4.5 billion years old. Lets take a look at some real evidence for a young earth ( taken from here): 1) The continents are eroding too quickly. If the continents were billions of years old, they would have eroded by wind and water many times over. Mountain uplift and other ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¹ÃârecyclingÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ processes are nowhere near capable of compensating for this. 2) There is not enough helium in the atmosphere. Helium, a light gas, is formed during radioactive alpha decay in rock minerals. It rapidly escapes and enters the atmosphere much faster than it can escape EarthÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s gravity.2 Even if God had created the world with no helium to begin with, the small amount in the atmosphere would have taken at most around two million years to accumulate. This is far less than the assumed 3,000-million-year age of the atmosphere. 4) Many fossils indicate that they must have formed quickly, and could not have taken long time-spans. 5) The oceans are nowhere near salty enough. Each year, the worldÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢s rivers and underground streams add millions of tonnes of salt to the sea, and only a fraction of this goes back onto the land. Using the most favorable possible assumptions for long-agers, the absolute maximum age of the oceans is only a tiny fraction of their assumed billions-of-years age. __________________________________ How do scientists prove the earth's age, carbon dating you say? Lets have a look at carbon dating (taken from here) The man who invented Carbon dating knew that atmospheric carbon would reach equilibrium in 30,000 years. He assumed that the earth was millions of years old, and that it was already at equilibrium. However each time they test it, they find more c14 in the atmosphere, and have realized that we are only 1/3 the way to equilibrium. - What does this mean? It means that based on c14 formation, the earth has to be less than 1/3 of 30,000 years old. This would make the earth less than 10,000 years old! Carbon dating is based on the assumption that the amount of C14 in the atmosphere has always been the same. But there is more carbon in the atmosphere now than there was 4 thousand years ago. ___________________________ I entirely believe the earth is only about 6000 years old. I take the bible literally, which is how it should be. It is not just a "moral book", it is absolute truth. People often laugh at these beliefs, but more often then not they only rant and know next to nothing on the subject.