NO.1: a person can have many morals. They might either just have (what you consider) bad morals, or they might just have (what you consider) good morals and chose not to listen to them. It's all a matter of choice which brings me back to my point. A scammer CHOOSES to take advantage of stupid people that CHOOSE not to take heed to the warnings that they are given. NO.2: in reference to your statement that I quoted above, if you really believe that luring a dog or scamming someone is a "small, fleeting thing", then why would you try to compare that to rape? I apologize for not stating this earlier, but when a person is scammed in a computer game, if the person is stupid, then the blame falls equally on the scammer and the scammed(if the person is stupid). I doubt that anyone can tell that they are about to be raped until maybe a minute before the event occurs. It is not a good idea to compare being scammed (a small fleeting thing that you can recover from quickly), to being raped (which has long-term effects on a person's mental, emotional, and sometimes phyiscal status). Rape is not a small, fleeting thing and neither animal cruelty. Rape is only avoidable in certain circumstances(should've said that earlier). A dog, as far as we know, isn't aware that it is being lured to it's death. BUT, in a game that has updates every week, messages about being scammed, easily accessible sites that are about said game, and EASILY ACCESSIBLE RULES about being scammed on said game's own site, then it is NOT an ignorant, unaware, person that gets scammed in said game often. It is the stupid, obnoxious, blind person that believes that the world is black and white and that they're on the lighter side that is scammed. What I am trying to say is, Tolerate ignorance, condemn stupidity, and stop those that take advantage of the two groups. BTW, when is Malo going to respond? I want some input from him/her. It'll make this thing more interesting.