OW vs. CoS OW vs. 2m Brought up a very good point, if a rule is claimed to be broken, how much evidence should their be before a winner is actually declared. Also do the winners final numbers matter. Starting: Ow- 17 vs. CoS-19 Ending: Ow-0 Cos-14 But, OW was declared the winner due to a mishap in CoS's ML, pulling from their main and recruitment ML. Another Example Starting: Ow-9 vs. 2m-20/28 Ending: Ow-0 2m-20/28 I do not know what the actual numbers were for 2m cause their was no solid evidence on their numbers. I attempted to talk to both leaders/warlord (all of CoS is banned from the OW IRC channel), the 2m leader stated "They didnt even kill one of us." If it was 20 v 9 the outcome would have been the same, 2m's ML outlevels OW's ML. Though if their was solid evidence that 2m attacked with 20+ the outcome probably been different. Which leads me to stay,IF any side think their is a rule that is broken they must provide SOLID evidence, Pictures or videos that clearly show the rule being broken, not just one video or screenshot, but many different angles and perspectives. Also make it possible to give both same amount of chances to justify whether or not the rule was broken. I don't like to see fellow RuneScape players debate over a War that they might have won even though the opposing clan still had 10+ left, stop crying. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erZRes5Hvos