Lose No Hope

dw im not going to do it today, probably not even tomorrow.

lol i want to see them compete for cwars and chompy

clever squabby

go to enaids blog

yup

in my last 10 kills, i finally broke my dry streak. effigies love me again

92 slayer 95 strength at the beginning of a dark beast task :)

Actually, I think it will be pretty easy to see who is harpie material and who isn't.

inb4applicationisrequired

hehe I remember turning it off during the battle after doing the glitch off cinnabar island, and I didn't lose my saved file.

1. Don't ban the bots. Make an extra whatever money. Maybe lose a few guys here and there. The people who are still addicted to my game are going to pay anyways and there's not a damn thing they can do about it, because they've invested far too much into my game already. Huehuehuehuehuehue. Seriously. Look at the number of posters on the official forums, for instance. Even if every single one of those guys ragequit, Jagex loses maybe, what, 1000-2000 posters? This isn't counting the F2P, of course, which is also a sizable portion. Vocal minority. I've said it over and over again. 2. Ban the bots now (how DO we tell bots from addicts to me game, anyways?). Lose the bot money. No guarantee of attracting players back because people'll just whine about the next thing we throw out. Best if we ban a few things periodically ... See where I'm going? Most players quit Runescape not because of bots, but because the game is no longer enjoyable. Why? Maybe real life finally caught up. Or maybe they realize that the accomplishments they've achieved matters very little in the end. However, it is awesome to hop onto the bot bandwagon and proclaim loudly that you're quitting out of a sense of justice and that bots are too bad and blah. Bots are a problem. But perhaps the game itself is at fault for being so simplistic. Nowadays, it takes more than simple Skinnerian mechanisms to keep players entertained. Sorry to say, but their logic is pretty simple. If you're fed up enough, you've quit already, and bots or no bots there isn't a thing we could do to make you come back and spend money anyways. So ... *waves* We know you'll be back. Do you imply bots are good for the game? Then if they are, why wouldn't jagex just jump it, and start selling items themself commonly bought from bots - apparently that is actually "good".. And by providing a safe manner to do so they can both prevent overcrowding, & bad experiences about bad sellers.. On top of that they can make more profit than those bots earn them (face it: a bot earns more money by selling his items than it costs to run the bot. So apparently there's a market where people want to spent more on this game). But nooooo once jagex seems to indicate any micro transaction people jump and shout that it is bad for the game. Yet bots -who are effectivelly micro transactions- are not bad? He never once said or implied bots are good for the game... I'm not sure where you think you are getting that from.

nope

nty

I have 36. 11 tasks dry and dark beasts next.

icwatudidthar

.png tbh

I'm on an effigy dry streak and squabby is lacking in male comfort.

9 [bleep]ing tasks dry of effigies... give me one this spectre task pls

in this thread? what.

Understand, you do not have the experience to answer certain questions. Obviously I'd use laws in c1 and was debating if cosmics were useful in normal dungeons. And as some deduced I was wondering if keying/not keying had any impact on usefulness of either bind. @Little: Thanks for the comment. Their advice made the most sense and was what I was paying attention to. I've just been kicking around still because bad/improper advice annoys me when the poster cannot understand they're not qualified. So you base your opinion on bias? Erm... opinions are biased...

Harpiescape+4

pfft who reads ;)

wat