1 and 5. the rest arent up to standard IMO. colours and text are very well executed in 1 and 5. the random flame on the right side of no.2 just throws off the colours and looks horrible IMO. and whats with the word turd floating through it? O.O
ive got to agree completely with nad here. and woopi, im not being an arse here, but the only reason you like it is because you dont understand it IMO.
Or just understanding how to use the program to cut out the image... :anxious: no. unless you know what ur talking about plz :-$ and dont butt into me and naz's conversations <3 fair enough you need to understand how to use the pen tool, but you need to understand how to render also. rendering isnt a tool of the program u can do by 'understanding the program' last time I checked everything you did for "rendering" was through the program. Its not hard WeeBoab... u do a perfect one then. and show me ur 1st try not ur 10th :o its hard to get a good cut untill you learn to do it.
I think that the placement of the text is fine. Except maybe make the text a little bigger because it's right there on the edge of being to small for me. if the text was better i wouldnt mind the placement. but it sticks out like a sore thumb in this tag. ugly white (maybe gradient to black?) text sitting in the middle of a blue tag =\
Or just understanding how to use the program to cut out the image... :anxious: no. unless you know what ur talking about plz :-$ and dont butt into me and naz's conversations <3 fair enough you need to understand how to use the pen tool, but you need to understand how to render also. rendering isnt a tool of the program u can do by 'understanding the program'
what makes u think i dont want to draw attention to the text? i said i didnt want it to be the focal, i didnt say u shouldnt look at it at all. and yes i use photoshop CS2. may start using CS3, ive got it in my loft/attic somewhere thanks to you so would the spamming ones. well done [wagon] =D>
not the program, you need to know how to render, which can be done with gimp and other programs too. hell it can be done with any program, just not as well as PS
it does take practise to go round the whole image, and some time i might add, with the pen tool skillfully zoomed in so that every pixel is about 100x or more bigger than normal nadril.
plz 2 spam more? the lighting at the top is to add focal to brad :o a stream of light around the text? hmm... i think that would draw more attention to it than it has now, which wouldnt be good for the tag - u dont want the text to be the focal :o updated with V6