Jump to content

Shadow_Wu

Members
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Shadow_Wu

  1. My apologies. But the "stock" is not blended in. :/. .. And I know what a stock image is. You don't have to keep on pestering me and explaining to me about what a stock is. I've used plenty of stocks in the past. If you made her the focal point, then blend in on the bottom. More negative space wouldn't hurt either. I prefer dark signatures, but it seems you like bright ones, so I'll let you work with that to perfect it. Maybe some lighting would do justice as well.
  2. I've never seen one person with so much time on your hands.. Don't you have school and other things to worry about other than gfx.? And if you really like it, try creating some variety other than just sigs... :? Anyways, the sig's really nice. The red however in the fire is a nice approach, but it just doesn't do justice to the stock..
  3. One sentence that shoud sum up all my thoughts: Your whoring your own style. I know that you like them, but... It's nice to be original. Try something new everytime. I kept on doing the same thing with one of my favorite styles, but now I'm trying not to use that style anymore. I'm not saying that you should totally give up and go back, but At least try something new. I really liked that smudging technique you used (especially on the..*ahem*suggestive*ahem* theme on the...plastic protection device, o.o, mind if I borrow that PSD? I'll let you see the one you've been DYING to get hold of. About the sig: Some parts of the dark areas look over saturated and contrasted. Most of the bright parts are really bright. Try using the clone stamp and some brushing to distrbute the light evenly. Right now, it looks really "noobish" in the background. You're using the spatter too much. Especially on the C4D. Now they look like a bunch of squiggly lines. Render isn't even blended in. Doesn't look like you tried anyways. The Title "Radiance" and the text look kind of...plain? You've been using that style of text on all your sigs. Try something new.
  4. Shadow_Wu

    Shadow

    I like the idea. But there isn't much of a flow. Most of the smudging is just going outwards away from the render.
  5. Yeah.. ...I NEED THOSE STOCKS... I've tried looking for them. NO use.
  6. :o. It might be the first one that I've done that's good.
  7. For a friend who wanted one..Don't mind the text...really. All defaults. Didn't really try anything new.
  8. Yeah it's two stocks. I couldn't draw either one of those if my life depended on it. :S.
  9. Let me find the original. (looks best on the black....)
  10. Post the stock so I can see where you got it from. :XD: Nice job though. The checkered pattern's getting really old. I mean really old.
  11. A manip since..how long.. :roll:
  12. I see. I'll make a new version soon. I like your suggestion. THanks for comments :D.
  13. Yes, I know it's above the limit :? Just rate it. :D.
  14. Yep, you've definitely made this one good. It doens't look like you really put yourself into this. I'd say, just stick to sprites :
  15. Yeah. Agreed. I might try something like that. But right now, It's not that it's the same. It's supposed to be shiny stuff flying to the center :P . So, your opinioin stands, and so does mine. But I thank you for your comment. It's always nice when you have some different views from different styles of artistic value. I apologize if I sounded in any way harsh in my last post.
  16. I acknowledge your opinion, but I have to disagree. Maybe you don't really like the simplicity of a large piece like this, but not everything has to be active. It doesn't really need to have more than one thing going on.
  17. I teach lessons..but that will cost you :twisted: ....Let's say....$5 dollars per hour. O:)
  18. @Nadril- Well it's supposed to be a high energy force collapsing inwards, so I wouldn't be suprised if it looked like a radial blur. :| Thanks for comments. Weeboab..you're scaring me with your affection to my work. :shock:
  19. My first one actually. Rate it or hate it. Woot, I haven't been here since my visit to China. Hope you like it. It's like 800k, so it takes time.
  20. Looks nice :P. once you're finished, mind if I manip it?
  21. :P. I don't know how you can't. The flow is going from the top left to the bottom right.
  22. umm..not much to say here...I need to fix the contrast, it all seems a little bland...but rate it. And it's in the sig limits XD.
  23. No clue.....I think it started with a K?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.