Latest pixel stretch.

[ThruItAll]

I've made 3 px stretches so far, and I'm addicted. In my style, I did not follow a tutorial because it came out way too "girly". And I was looking for a more mercenary look.

 

 

C/C appreciated.

[Jopie211]

It's very busy, but I like it. Border and font goes well with it IMO, so good job. :-)

[ThruItAll]

The noise filter did a lot to it IMO. \

 

Thanks for replying.

[Guest Evanhart1]

Not bad :thumbsup: I give them a 8/10 overall.

[hardwick246]

Although that is not really my style, but I'll try to keep to C/C to that style.

 

 

 

- My eye keeps looking at the render. I don't know if you meant to stick it in the signature.

 

- Absolutely love the background and see no flaws.

 

- Maybe some more with the text.

 

- I don't prefer that border, but everyone is different. 8-)

 

 

 

That signature looks like it would work good for a tech signature, but thats an opinion. :-#

 

 

 

8/10

 

1 pt- No signature is perfect

 

1 pt- Just because its not my style

 

 

 

Great job.

[navyplaya]

I like it overall, except IMO it is to busy around the render its self. The background is awesome in general, and the font fits well. If it were mine, i would add another 1px stroke on the outside of the actuall sig before the white begins.

[Rainy_Day]

Looks great. Whilst I'm not usually keen on thick borders, these all suites well.

 

 

 

Some extra lighting effects on the central 'character' in the signature would probably make it stand out more though. Perhaps create a new layer, import that image, then add gaussian blur, then change the opacity of that layer?

 

 

 

Just to make it blend a little beter. :)

[ThruItAll]

You think?? IMO

 

Motion Blur > Gaussian Blur.

[Rainy_Day]

Nah, Motion Blur pushes it all in one direction, which is good if you are actually trying to give a sense of motion to the image, but I always preferred Gaussian. :P