Aquiel Posted November 10, 2007 Share Posted November 10, 2007 Medias doublespeak Found this while doing some research. For those who don't want to read through it, it gives examples of words the medias distorted. It's surprisingly insightful, it's exactly how those words are being used. ___ Language deliberately distorted to veil its true meaning is commonly referred to as 'doublespeak' (from Orwell's 'newspeak' and 'doublethink'). This distortion of words is becoming increasingly severe and overt. Even modern cinema, as evidenced in the immensely popular V for Vendetta, has noticed and commented upon this fact. The meanings of words are being changed. Disturbing, and often violent, concepts are labeled with neutral and ambiguous words, like "collateral damage", "reducing safety margins" and "extraordinary rendition", while neutral or meaningless words are given nefarious and suggestive meanings, like the ubiquitous yet chimerical "suspected terrorist". SNIP The remainder of this essay will provide contemporary examples of such distortions of language. As a warning, I should say that stripping the veneer of ideology from the following words and phrases may come as a shock to some readers... There is no epic "clash of civilizations"; there is no primeval "good against evil"; there is no heroic "protecting Western freedoms and values". These are simply ideological "literary motifs", and the truth is much more prosaic. War Cries 1. "Bringing peace to [insert foreign country here]" - This refers not to bringing any kind of meaningful peace to a country in turmoil but to killing all foreign enemies. The idea is that, without anyone to fight back, there will be peace. For a psychopath, 'peace' is achieved when any and all opposition has been exterminated; 2. "Bringing freedom to [insert foreign country here]" - This refers not to any real freedoms, but merely the psychopathic freedom to rape, pillage, plunder, and murder a given group of people. For a psychopath, freedom means being able to do whatever he wants, without opposition. 3. "Protecting our Freedoms" - A variation of #2, this simply means protecting the right to rape, pillage, plunder, and murder from the perceived threat of people who disapprove of, and may attempt to bring a stop to, such acts. 4. "Defending oneself" / "acting in self-defense" - This refers not to any real type of defense resulting from an unprovoked attack. Self-defense means that a psychopath has the right to maim, torture, terrorize, or kill anyone who complains that he is already being maimed, tortured, terrorized by the psychopath in question. For a psychopath, defending oneself means attacking and blaming the victim for the psychopath's own crimes, and then holding them fully accountable for these actions. 5. "Support our troops" - The does not refer to any real moral, empathic, physical, emotional, or monetary support for those sent to die as cannon fodder. For a psychopath, "support" means sacrifice; normal people, whether part of, or foreign to, the country of the pathocracy, must be killed, as they form an ever-present obstacle to complete control. Wars are a perfect means to not only kill a pathocracy's own citizens, but also those of any 'enemy state'. On another level it means "support what we say our troops should be doing - do not, under any circumstances, ask the troops themselves or support their right to disobey illegal orders". 6. "The War on Terror" - The war on terror is a war of terror. It is a war on the victims of terror at the hands of psychopaths. When the victims of psychopathic terror respond (as have the Palestinians to the terror of the Israeli government and military), they are attacked in the name of 'anti-terrorism'. The victims of terrorists (e.g. the Palestinians) become the 'terrorists', and are killed as a result. Masks of Sanity 1. "Outrageous conspiracy theories" - This refers to actual conspiracies. By associating the word 'outrageous' with completely plausible conspiracies, normal people are hesitant to question "official" lies. In fact, all covert/black operations are considered 'conspiracies'. However, when one is exposed for what it is (whether it be an assassination, a propaganda campaign, a spy-ring, a drug-running operation, a coup d'̮̩̉̉tat, a false-flag), it is pejoratively labeled "conspiracy theory" for the purpose of damage control. 2. "Patriotism" - This does not refer to love of one's homeland, but unquestioning belief and support of official government doctrine. Anyone opposing the official doctrine is labeled as "unpatriotic", "anti-American", "anti-Israel", etc. 3. "Diplomacy" - This refers to threats and intimidation preceding an already decided upon military strike. For example, the invasion of and the inevitable invasion of , Syria , Lebanon etc. 4. "Appeasement" - This refers to failure to preemptively attack those considered to be "enemies", like Iran presently, and usually refers to an ideology that promotes peace between nations. For example, Donald Rumsfeld's statement: "Can we truly afford to believe that somehow, some way, vicious extremists can be appeased?" In fact, Rumsfeld represents the very "vicious extremists" whom the majority of world powers are appeasing. 5. "Free Elections" This refers to the 'freedom' psychopaths have to steal elections, by bribing candidates with campaign donations, blackmailing them for support, and using widespread voter fraud. In short, free elections are stolen elections. 6. "Morality" (e.g. "Jewish or Christian morality" or " Israel 's military is the most moral in the world"). When used in the context of a psychopathic military, 'morality' refers to the psychopathic morality of complete lack of conscience. For example, feeling empathy for your enemy is "soft", "weak" or "simple-minded". Cold-blooded killing machines are extremely moral soldiers, in the minds of pathocrats. Word Salad 1. "Extraordinary Rendition" - This phrase refers to "out-sourced torture", without any extradition proceedings. Cynically, 'rendition' can refer to "giving back" (although prisoners are often 'given back' to foreign countries that happen to not comply with human rights legislation), "melting down", "processing", as for industrial use, as livestock is "rendered". The euphemism is that these often innocent prisoners are processed as cattle. 2. "Collateral Damage" - The intentional killing of innocent civilians. 3. "Free Speech Zone" - A (usually) wire enclosure in which citizens who wish to publicly voice their displeasure with the ruling pathocracy are confined, which is set up at a enough of a distance from the representatives of said Pathocracy to ensure the displeasure does not actually reach them. Any dissenter wishing to express his or her free speech outside of the "free speech zone" may be harassed or arrested. 4. "Intelligence" - The information (viewable only by military and government leaders) that is used to justify war, revoking freedoms, and increasing control. Since there is no way to verify intelligence due to its secrecy, it can easily (and usually is) fabricated, and the proof of its fabrication usually comes only after it has served its purpose, and hundreds of thousands are dead. 5. "National Security" - How safe a country is, as determined by "intelligence". 6. "The world-wide threat of militant Islamo-fascism" - This reveals that the psychopaths uttering these words, in fact, wish to take over the world of normal people, installing the universal 'law' of the psychopath. This 'law' can manifest itself in any ideology, whether capitalist, socialist, fascist, communist, Judaic, Talmudic, Christian, Muslim, etc. 7. "Globalization" - This is not about the distribution of wealth to poor countries, but another way for pathocratic corporations to steal and plunder the natural resources of those same poorer countries, leaving the native populations to starve. Non-substantive Labels 1. "Suicide Bomber" - a) an explosive device detonated at a distance by intelligence services of the pathocracy (Mossad, CIA, MI5, etc.) and blamed on a fanatical extremist belonging to the religion of the enemy of the pathocracy. This can also take the form of bombs being placed in vehicles of the civilian population at check points and later detonated to create the most mayhem and chaos while maximizing the propaganda effect. cool.gif A patsy incited to blow themselves up for a cause that appears worthwhile, but which only suits their handlers, which are again agents of the intelligence services of the pathocracy (Mossad, CIA, MI5, etc.). 2. "Hero" - This refers to a pathocracy's own military 'cannon fodder',who died for the expressed purpose of "bringing freedom and democracy to [country]". They usually die young, and serve the purpose of emotionally entangling a hesitant population into a war of aggression. Used in conjunction with "support our troops", this label stifles any criticism of an aggressor's war crimes. 3. "Infiltrators" - Walid Phares, a neoconservative Pathocrat, recently wondered "how deeply have 'Jihadist' elements infiltrated the U.S. government and federal agencies?" In fact, as anyone opposing Zionist terror and propaganda is labeled a "terrorist sympathizer", or "terrorist", these 'infiltrators' are merely individuals who oppose Zionist terror and propaganda. 4. "Anti-Semitic" - A label which refers to any behavior critical of the pathocratic Zionist genocide of Palestinians, or critical of any crime committed by a Jew. By stifling any criticism of Jews in general, psychopathic Jews escape any legitimate criticism for their crimes. 5. "Self-hating Jew" - A Jew that displays "anti-Semitic" behavior but cannot have this label/libel applied for obvious reasons. 6. "Anti-defamation" - This refers to "defamation". The so-called "Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith" and their imitators commonly use such terms as 'anti-semite', 'Islamo-fascist', 'rabble-rouser', 'radical Left', 'paranoiac', 'lunatic', 'conspiracy theorist', 'madman', 'nut', 'terrorist sympathizer' to stifle criticism of Israel or pro-Israeli policies. 7. "Security Contractors" - More accurately described as mercenaries - agencies and individuals paid to carry out 'black' or 'covert' operations, usually involving false-flag operations or inciting sectarian violence. 8. "Insurgents" - Individuals who are resisting (often by force of arms) an illegal invasion of their country by a foreign power. 9. "Terrorists" - Very often, also individuals resisting an illegal invasion of their country. Terrorism can also be used factually to describe the false flag operations of the illegal invaders. But generally, when this is the case, they are called "Arab Terrorists." 10. "Freedom Fighters" - Usually the very same "terrorists", when their actions are acceptable or funded by members of the Pathocracy. For example, when being funded by the CIA and ISI in Afghanistan against Soviet invasion, militant Islamic groups were referred to as freedom fighters, not terrorists. ___ I lost the direct link, but it was on http://www.sott.net ___ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLancer Posted November 10, 2007 Share Posted November 10, 2007 You should know by now that the average American (note: Not one who follows news and posts on message boards) is pretty easy to brainwash into believing whatever agenda any powerful media or government may have. If you never follow world events, just work and feed your kids, you wont really think twice when you hear "suicide bomber kills 21 in Iraq/Israel/Palestine/syria", come on, the thought of Mossad paying massive blood money to the bomber's families for attacking a marketplace & taking the blame on his religion/country/faction... Wont even cross your mind. You can't blame a normal person who isn't educated enough of world events. If he develops a phobia of Islam or always thinks 'terrorist' when he sees an Arab, it's 100% what he heard on the news in the last few years. Nobody is born to hate another group of people. You get info, and you make decisions and opinions based on that. If you only get very limited and xenophonic info, that's what you'll turn into. An intellectually limited racist. Blame the news agencies and channels like Fox who use the misguiding terms, not the ordinary Joe who started hating islamic people because of total misunderstanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquiel Posted November 10, 2007 Author Share Posted November 10, 2007 Guillible individuals need articles like the one I posted above to realise how they are being manipulated. I don't think it matters whos fault it is. The situation exists, we deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickeley102 Posted November 11, 2007 Share Posted November 11, 2007 I found that piece very interesting. I always thought that patriotism is more often than not used as a pretty thin viel for rascism. especially in South America This was exemplified (and perhaps overdone) in Borat Its true how manipulative the media can be, they are the most impartial of all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLancer Posted November 11, 2007 Share Posted November 11, 2007 I found that piece very interesting. I always thought that patriotism is more often than not used as a pretty thin viel for rascism. especially in South America This was exemplified (and perhaps overdone) in Borat Its true how manipulative the media can be, they are the most impartial of all I think you mean Southern USA (as in the 'bible belt'), yes I remember that scene... I still can't believe it wasn't staged. He started with the usual "God bless America" stuff, then progressed to chants like "Death to all people, women and children in Iraq" and a lot of people were still cheering for him :shock: Or the southern gun dealer who replied to his "What is the best gun for killing jews" with a straight face, recommending a gun... And those same people are allowed to vote... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tryto Posted November 11, 2007 Share Posted November 11, 2007 ^ good thing most of them don't vote. When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. ~Jonathan SwiftWebsite Updates/Corrections here. WE APPRECIATE YOUR INPUT! Crewbie's Missions!Contributor of the Day!Thanks to artists: Destro3979, Guthix121, Shivers21, and Unoalexi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InkofDeath Posted November 11, 2007 Share Posted November 11, 2007 I always knew the media worked it's way around words for it to sound more dangerous, or to strike fear into our hearts, even if just a little. It's suppose to keep us on edge, and addicted to their articles/shows. That's why only 1/3 of News is positive things. I don't know read it somewhere. Hence 'Do you believe everything you hear,'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now