yes, ive read all the responses saying if i want an update, i should buy a membership--so what, it would be cool.

 

 

 

you start out it lumby with an old woman sitting by the river feeding the ducks. you ask why shes so depressed. she responds" the ducks arent hungry lately" you say you want to help...you get some sort of yummy-ness potion and put it on some bread. use bread with knife. give to old woman. bamm- you can make a new pot(p2p) and f2p gets a new item- a rubber duck. if you loose it you can get another rfom the old woman. gain-1 quest point, new potion, rubber duck. yippy

two things,

 

first : f2p quests are on the not to suggest list

 

second: this would just bring another crappy item for f2p, using 1 more spot in the bank

Can't we poison the bloody buggers instead?

I think this suggestion is not well-thought!

 

There may come a new f2p quest, but then it has to be a good one!

 

 

 

~Chielekop

two things,

 

first : f2p quests are on the not to suggest list

 

second: this would just bring another crappy item for f2p, using 1 more spot in the bank

 

 

 

sure its a new crappy item but its like holiday items, it can be retrieved from the old lady. another pointless quest but think of all the pointless p2p quests--gertrudes cat....

I don't support.

 

Waste of bank space.

By the way is that rubber duck from the holiday event item?

 

If it is then i'll support because I can destroy it and back it back later on.

Think through your idea. What will the duck do, what will the potion do, how will you get the potion in f2p, and what are the requirements? There's to many loose ends for it to be any good. PLus I would rather have a real quest for f2p then this travesty. Two minutes of minor enjoyment. Make a puzzle for it, something to add difficulty. Anyways, gertrude's cat isn't useless, it opens a lot more quests.