Do we really need a min price cap?

 

 

 

The only purpose I see them serving is to set prices for Player Stock in General Stores. Which stinks anyways

 

 

 

I would believe it also prevents RWT, in some strange way. :roll:

 

 

 

Don't look at me for their frame of thought.. I didn't wreck the duel arena. -.-

Do we really need a min price cap?

 

 

 

The only purpose I see them serving is to set prices for Player Stock in General Stores. -.- Which stinks anyways.

 

 

 

 

 

why are you asking? he asked if their might be one. which suggest you did not read this thread, then followed up with an assumed, yet logical post derived solely from the title.

 

 

 

 

 

at least thats how I saw it.

 

 

 

Thanks Jessy. It seems like half the people are not reading or not understanding the topic. Yet they post a reply. Its kind of hard to keep this topic moving when everyone start shifting to talk about the minimum price on items set by the general price. And not what this topic is about: absolute minimum caps on items.

 

 

 

Oh well. :(

It's rather simple.

 

 

 

If the item isn't selling, as I'd surmise they aren't, then the price won't change. This is why the whole "Minimum/maximum" cap should be done away with, as most prices won't change until people start buying them at their "lows".

It's rather simple.

 

 

 

If the item isn't selling, as I'd surmise they aren't, then the price won't change. This is why the whole "Minimum/maximum" cap should be done away with, as most prices won't change until people start buying them at their "lows".

 

 

 

You are wrong. That isn't how it works. I'd tell you to go do some rudimentary research before posting misinformation like this, but then you'd chide me that's it's my responsibility to keep you informed before you post. So, you win. Don't look it up, don't believe me, and I'll hold up my end of the bargain and make fun of you every time you post. Deal?