Can I use superheat to make cannon balls? [Answered - thanks]

 

 

 

And is this more efficient than running back and forth to a furnace?

What?

 

Are you asking whether you can superheat ore into cannonballs? If so no.

 

Are you asking if superheated ore(bars) can be turned into cannonballs? If so yes, they're just normal bars...

Woops, my bad, Meant bar XD

 

 

 

Ok awesome, and would this be more efficient than running back and forth to a furnace?

Woops, my bad, Meant bar XD

 

 

 

Ok awesome, and would this be more efficient than running back and forth to a furnace?

 

 

 

Much more efficient.

Sweet, I will stock up on some natures then :) Thanks for the help.

Wrong.

 

Superheat can ONLY be cast on an ore. Proof:

 

you cannnot superheat an hour never ever :thumbsup:

That's a pretty big picture....hide tags?

That's a pretty big picture....hide tags?

 

Those of you with lesser screens get a scroll box under the picture, so there's no page stretching with the new Tip.it boards. :thumbsup:

just to make it clear again

 

 

 

Smelt 1 ore without furnace

 

 

 

ores not bars

You can't make Steel bars using superheat.

You can't make Steel bars using superheat.

 

 

 

now your just confusing everyone

 

 

 

you cant make cannonballs using superheat

 

you can make steel bars using superheat

Why did everyone feel the need to repeat what I said? ..........

 

And compfreak, I did say superheat couldn't make cannonballs.

Why did everyone feel the need to repeat what I said? ..........

 

And compfreak, I did say superheat couldn't make cannonballs.

 

 

 

Are you asking if superheated ore(bars) can be turned into cannonballs? If so yes, they're just normal bars...

 

 

 

:-w

Why did everyone feel the need to repeat what I said? ..........

 

And compfreak, I did say superheat couldn't make cannonballs.

 

 

 

Are you asking if superheated ore(bars) can be turned into cannonballs? If so yes, they're just normal bars...

 

 

 

:-w

 

 

 

That was because the OP phrased the question really awkardly... :wall: I didn't even know that was the question then.

 

I'll just make an edit:

 

 

 

Are you asking if superheated iron ore(with 2 coal)Which is a Steel Bar can be turned into cannonballs by smithing? If so yes, they're just normal bars...

 

This doesn't mean you can skip the anvil and hammer step though! You still need to use it

 

 

 

Happy now?

Sweet, I will stock up on some natures then :) Thanks for the help.

 

He obviously didn't realize it.

 

 

 

You can't make Steel bars using superheat.

 

Wrong.

 

 

 

 

And compfreak, I did say superheat couldn't make cannonballs.

 

No, you didn't, and the OP didn't realize it even if it was what you meant.

 

 

 

Here's the facts, again:

 

 

 

SUPERHEAT CAN MAKE 2 COAL + 1 IRON INTO A STEEL BAR, BUT IT CANNOT BE USED TO MAKE THAT STEEL BAR INTO A CANNONBALL. Period. Tested by me, personally, with a screenshot for proof.

I agree with you, I'll just need to make sure my answer is more clear next time.

 

 

 

PS:

 

Sweet, I will stock up on some natures then :) Thanks for the help.

 

I took it as him superheating the bars for the cannonball making, oh well.

 

 

 

EDIT: Now I look at it, it does seem like OP thinks you can superheat cannonballs. :oops:

 

Can I use superheat to make cannon balls?

 

Very simple. NO. Can we all please stop posting misinformation now?

That's a pretty big picture....hide tags?

 

Those of you with lesser screens get a scroll box under the picture, so there's no page stretching with the new Tip.it boards. :thumbsup:

 

 

 

But it took me and my fail internet a while to load.

 

 

 

He responded that he would stock nats in RESPONSE TO WHAT I TOLD HIM. I answered the question if superheating is more efficient than furnace, which the answer to is yes.

Why did everyone feel the need to repeat what I said? ..........

 

And compfreak, I did say superheat couldn't make cannonballs.

 

 

 

Are you asking if superheated ore(bars) can be turned into cannonballs? If so yes, they're just normal bars...

 

 

 

:-w

 

 

 

That was because the OP phrased the question really awkardly... :wall: I didn't even know that was the question then.

 

I'll just make an edit:

 

 

 

Are you asking if superheated iron ore(with 2 coal)Which is a Steel Bar can be turned into cannonballs by smithing? If so yes, they're just normal bars...

 

This doesn't mean you can skip the anvil and hammer step though! You still need to use it

 

 

 

Happy now?

 

You don't need a hammer and Anvil to make Cannonballs, it's like making rings you just need the Ammo Mould.

That's a pretty big picture....hide tags?

 

Those of you with lesser screens get a scroll box under the picture, so there's no page stretching with the new Tip.it boards. :thumbsup:

 

 

 

But it took me and my fail internet a while to load.

 

 

 

He responded that he would stock nats in RESPONSE TO WHAT I TOLD HIM. I answered the question if superheating is more efficient than furnace, which the answer to is yes.

 

And what you told him was in response to his saying 'great, is that more effiecent then running to a furnace?' which was in response to weiyaoli's saying that they COULD be superheated. The answer to the OPs question is NO, and it is not more efficient because you CANNOT do it.

That's a pretty big picture....hide tags?

 

Those of you with lesser screens get a scroll box under the picture, so there's no page stretching with the new Tip.it boards. :thumbsup:

 

 

 

But it took me and my fail internet a while to load.

 

 

 

He responded that he would stock nats in RESPONSE TO WHAT I TOLD HIM. I answered the question if superheating is more efficient than furnace, which the answer to is yes.

 

And what you told him was in response to his saying 'great, is that more effiecent then running to a furnace?' which was in response to weiyaoli's saying that they COULD be superheated. The answer to the OPs question is NO, and it is not more efficient because you CANNOT do it.

 

 

 

Ah ha, so it is. Ok this thread got confusing, sorry about that.

 

 

 

Ain't such a quick question now though :lol:

THEN WHO WAS PHONE?

THEN WHO WAS PHONE?

 

 

 

huh?

 

 

 

Well I guess that sums it all up then :P Good thing I didn't stock up on those natures, and thanks for the proof in clarifying my query :)

 

What a funny debate this all turned out to be? :P

 

 

 

Happy Christmas! :)