StarCraft tag.

[VjuliusT]

 

 

 

 

Opinions/comments please.

[Sam]

1st one looks better, the colour overlay/adjustment you applied to the 2nd one makes it seem LQ.

 

 

 

I like the colour scheme of this tag, though I don't like the little bits of very dark grey you've smugded in places.

 

 

 

What is that thing on the right?

 

 

 

If you want to try perspective, blur the bottom right corner of that door/machine/thing and also blur quite close to the top left corner, and you'll get a good perspctive on your sig.

 

 

 

 

 

Keep it up :thumbup:

[VjuliusT]

Thanks for the info Little , I'll give it a shot when I get back home.

 

 

 

The things on the right are tubes.

[Shiny]

The flow also needs working on. I'd also blur some of the background, to give depth.

[Stilev]

i dont get this random fad that everyone is going of just putting something over a render and thinking it is blended, the left part specifically where her arm meets the cloud/smudging is very abrupt and not very well done, the right side makes me feel she is in a cloud of mist in a factory, the mist you made should cut off part of her, but it shouldn't just but so sharp, if you made it 'slightly' less strong where the render and smudging meet, it would work alot better. it's not just you everyone seems to be doing this kinna stuff and i find it tacky

 

 

 

-my only compliant i really like it if that is/isn't improved

[Jopie211]

^ To be honest, I think some of the more experienced signature makers find that blending isn't one of the most important aspects to a good signature. But of course, you are entitled to your own opinion. :)

 

 

 

OT:

 

I quite like the colour scheme on V1 and the whole right side of the sig (although I agree adding some depth would improve it, I'd just blur the upper part - the bit next to her arm - a little), but the smudging on the left seems too 'dense'. It would be nice if some of the original stock was still visible, so maybe try erasing some of the darker parts of the smudgings with a soft brush. Also, the signature does seem to have some quality issues, but it's not too bad.

 

 

 

Overall, nice work.

[Stilev]

^ To be honest, I think some of the more experienced signature makers find that blending isn't one of the most important aspects to a good signature. But of course, you are entitled to your own opinion. :)

 

 

 

i just see alot of people trying to do it, and failing badly, this isn't done horribly, but it would be better if it wasn't there in my opinion, but its not my piece

[VjuliusT]

Thanks Stilev and Jopie for very helpful info! (No sarcasm), I love you guys (I know your a gal Jopie, no flame please). I'll tweak it later on :thumbup:.

[Jopie211]

I wouldn't flame you. :P