NOPE

Yep,

Another cool feature would be people being "random". So some survivors could be really useful, like a strong mechanic, so he has a trade application, but also can be very helpful in other tasks. Whereas some survivors wouldn't be very useful, like the stereotypical party girl. Again, all generated randomly based on variables, so that player 1 could rescue a survivor from location a, and get a completely different survivor as player 2.

 

@pepsi Yeah, it probably would be laggy, but tbh the games of today aren't being made to run on Windows 98. I think it would probably take a lot of memory/processing power, especially for hordes and such, randomly generating 50 zombies or whatnot to attack the player all at once would be pretty intensive.

 

Resident Evil Outbreak had that. Some characters had different skills, like lockpicking, having tools, etc.

Features that make games good...

 

Y U NO STANDARD?

Because the Video Game industry is terribly corrupted.

 

COUGH COUGH KOTICK

Oh yeah, do I really sound like a Mexican Monk?

It has been said before that me and my Mexican friend sound alike.

Yes you do. This coming from someone in Tennessee.

There is no tennis.

 

See?

I imagine the Zombie game I described to be like Fallout 3, with less "everything's gone" and where you could run places like Megaton.

fallout with less destroyed buildings.

imo if there was ever a zombie plague,

I would want to try a wide open area, with flood lights cover a square mile.

and then have a squad of 10 with machine guns and plenty of ammo.

See I told you guys. Pepsi is Mexican.

Never fear pepsi

A good portion of the posters in this forum needs to read this.

 

Posers?

Eh it could work both ways actually, but I meant posters.

Never fear pepsi

 

That has been posted here before.

now, what if instead hitler killed all the jews and captives, he had some disease or some [cabbage] and turned them all into zombies.

I could see that infection go for about a month or so.

Wait. What.

Oh wait. I totally misread that. I'm just going to go back to reading Cracked.

Oh wait. I totally misread that. I'm just going to go back to reading Cracked.

 

Damn right you better edit that.

I'll explain better

WWII

Hitler takes all the jews and other captives.

Hitler works/kills the jews and captives.

NOW WHAT IF instead of hitler killing them, he some how found a zombie disease and diseased all those 11 million (I think thats how many that was captive, correct me if wrong, I remember ^ million was of jews.) I could see that going for about a month or 2 months.

Depends on what time he did this. Also, I think time would be lessened when everyone in Europe already has a gun.

A good portion of the posters in this forum needs to read this.

 

Posers?

Eh it could work both ways actually, but I meant posters.

 

You could pretty much find 5 arguments of anything that aren't helping.

 

He doesn't even say that some of those are completely false, just that they are badly worded or exagerated.

Saying that inhaling smoke is good for you is pretty false.

Saying that inhaling smoke is good for you is pretty false.

 

BUT IT'S ALL NATURAL!!!!

Saying that consuming a McDonald's hamburger is good is also false.

 

But walk 5 blocks in any direction and you'll find a McDonald's.

 

Doesn't mean McDonald's shouldn't be legal. You should be able to choose for yourself if you consider that the flavour of the junk food is good enough to compensate for it clogging up your veins if you take too much of it.

 

It's only a matter of looking at the pros and the cons.

Saying that inhaling smoke is good for you is pretty false.

 

BUT IT'S ALL NATURAL!!!!

I know someone that has actually said this.

If you're hungry and need to eat, there's nothing wrong with eating Mcdonalds. Mcdonald's is bad in excess, as would be any other food, Mcdonalds gets the bad rap because you have to eat less excess for it to be bad.

 

If you are bored and want to do something, pumping smoke into your lungs is a pretty bad idea.

The ammount of smoke you consume from a joint is nothing compared to what you passively consume just by standing on a street inhaling the smoke of the cars.

I'm sure it doesn't help if you continue to inhale more smoke into your lungs.