ExpertSeth Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 well yeah, i used another pic in it, i know ppl dont like it here but else it wont turn out good :oops: rate and C/C plx :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wigglyw00 Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 i like your style m8 mst of the people here like pixel art :? Advice: >make the text bigger very hard to see. But thats it great sig 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronnie_kloet Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 lol! i didnt even see the text :oops: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Jeppoz Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 not considering the render, i still think the sig is pretty serverely flawed. I'm not a grunge expert so i'll just point out what my personal taste finds wrong. First of all a grunge sig shouldn't realy have all those patterns on it. As far as i know grunge work aswell as they'r random. dirty looking, chaotic. So i'd realy get rid of the foreground patterns, that are also too strong, covering the sig too much. Other than that, the bg isn't probably the best i've seen but might be ok. Skipping the render, the Text is so hard to read that you'd realy might reconsider its whole design (font, its size, and maybe even the color that doesn't match the sig so nicely). Keep it up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAGE Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 TJ has it all packed in there. I only just figured out there was text aswell when Wiggly said it was there. Am I right by guessing you used a pixel stretch at one stage for colour? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExpertSeth Posted October 28, 2005 Author Share Posted October 28, 2005 well yeah, it was jsut a bit of a try out with the pixel lines :P i do make some better lately, this was one of my personal bads :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeKeeper0 Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 i have to say, that it is a nice sig, i like the work, but the text does need to be a bit bigger... The name's Bee Keeper0 not BeeKeeper0! Boom chi boom boom chi boom boom chi boom boom chi... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts