This is my sig for the SOTW Contest on NGX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This version wont go in the contest since the contest requires a ninja being in the sig, but i think it looks a lot nicer and i apologize to operationfl for yelling at him.

 

 

 

looks like a big render with little background. blue.

 

average text.

looks like a big render with little background. blue.

 

average text.

 

 

 

Very astute of you for noticing that its a signature with a render.

 

 

 

Good job =D>

dude u asked for C/C, dont be a [bleep].

 

 

 

i like it, but most of it is the render.

dude u asked for C/C, dont be a *.

 

 

 

i like it, but most of it is the render.

 

 

 

i'm not being mean, he didnt give any CC at all.

 

 

 

Constructive criticism is the process of offering valid and well-reasoned opinions about the work of others, usually involving both positive and negative comments, in a friendly manner rather than an oppositional one. In collaborative work, this kind of criticism is often a valuable tool in raising and maintaining performance standards.

 

 

 

:?

looks like a big render with little background. blue.

 

average text.

 

 

 

Very astute of you for noticing that its a signature with a render.

 

 

 

Good job =D>

 

 

 

You're ignorant ok?

 

 

 

From my comments anyone with a reasonable intelligence could deduce that the sig is literally just a render with text and some weird background, this means you haven't done much to the sig, so why should it deserve more than 3/10?

 

It shouldn't is why :-)

 

 

 

Just because i criticised your work it doesn't mean you have to lash out because you can't make a signature of your own.

Try adding some Scanlines, possibly white, to lighten up the picture. Or mabey some texture brushes.

 

 

 

the render is FINE, its blended well and fits in great.

 

 

 

Operation, i have seen axe make some sigs that are much better then the one you are using right now.

 

 

 

Overall, i think it is a NICE sig

looks like a big render with little background. blue.

 

average text.

 

 

 

Very astute of you for noticing that its a signature with a render.

 

 

 

Good job =D>

 

 

 

You're ignorant ok?

 

 

 

From my comments anyone with a reasonable intelligence could deduce that the sig is literally just a render with text and some weird background, this means you haven't done much to the sig, so why should it deserve more than 3/10?

 

It shouldn't is why :-)

 

 

 

Just because i criticised your work it doesn't mean you have to lash out because you can't make a signature of your own.

 

 

 

I fail to see how

 

looks like a big render with little background. blue.

 

average text.

 

qualifies as constructive criticism.

 

 

 

The background was made by me and the render was edited. Would you like the sig without the render? Here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now you need to cut the crap right now and either deal out some good, maybe not in a positive manner, clean constructive criticism, or get the heck out of my topic and don't even reply to this at all. its that simple.

To tell the truth I like it a bit more without...

 

 

 

 

 

Other than that:

 

 

 

 

 

ooks like a big render with little background. blue.

 

average text.

can i pm you?

can i pm you?

 

 

 

Go for it, i really dont care.

 

 

 

To tell the truth I like it a bit more without...

 

 

 

Yeah i might take the render out and improve in that big hole right there.

sorry delete. V.sorry

NINJA FTW :D