xKing_Natex Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 i would like to make clear a point..... the high scores are NOT organized purely by exp. look up xking natex and look at the top of that page. the person with 681 total lvl has LESS exp than the lvl 680's under him..... i just would like to make this known to the ppl who said that it IS organized only by exp. and not by lvl or anything.... I had a topic locked because of these people giving me a stupid answer... plz think before u post... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
money_bought Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 its obviously ordered by level first, so 101 will be higher than 100, but the 100 with 1000 xp will be ranked above the 100 with 900xp, so xp i the sencond ranking catagory make any sense? | from a to b - f2p/p2p staker | Private chat - Currently on | click here to view my blog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xKing_Natex Posted August 28, 2006 Author Share Posted August 28, 2006 i no, that was wat i was saying... look at the topic high scores glitch. it got locked because the morons said it wasn't a glitch since it is ONLY ordered by exp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinkbullet3 Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 Wow, lol. You chose a great example to show others about the "high score glitch"... (493,936 is higher than 8,768,166, which is a HUGE difference). :lol: ^ Blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xKing_Natex Posted August 28, 2006 Author Share Posted August 28, 2006 no! not that! in my post aboiut the glitch, i showed that a player with the total lvl of 680 was higher ranked than the player with 681 total lvl.. you wanna know how i know it's a glitch? search up xking natex. I've got 3 million + total exp, and i am lower in rank than that other guy with 680 total lvl and under 2 mil exp. glitched. u guys don't seem to understand wat im saying... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alien_slof Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 no! not that! in my post aboiut the glitch, i showed that a player with the total lvl of 680 was higher ranked than the player with 681 total lvl.. you wanna know how i know it's a glitch? search up xking natex. I've got 3 million + total exp, and i am lower in rank than that other guy with 680 total lvl and under 2 mil exp. glitched. u guys don't seem to understand wat im saying... we do understand what you're saying, but you keep denying it, its not a glitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vppunkrocker Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 I wish the highscores would be organized by xp. Because my xp is high for my total lvl because i dont care about runecrafting or farming. My ranking would be higher... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimeStopper Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 So you are saying that someone with less level and exp is below you? Jagex must hate you then. Like forum text games much?um... from... MARS, yes, in the third county from the... left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombpie Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 I had a topic locked because of these people giving me a stupid answer... no, your topic wes locked because you failed to use the search button.(already MANY topics) PURE F2p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now