Not a good idea at all. As people've already said, they will just program their macros to log out after 1,499 of that resource obtained.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And for the invulerability, PKers could have a weak character be there for suicide, kill them, and have invulnerability, then go and kill whoever without worrying about food.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yeah that is true but i'm sure it could be for like 20 sec's u could get most of ur loot in that time with bein pjed

i think that the numbers and such shuold be like what they would see in a funny mirror so the autoer cant just copy the numbers and letters

nice idea, but it can't every 1500 it has to be a random number different for every person.

\ i support

i think that the numbers and such shuold be like what they would see in a funny mirror so the autoer cant just copy the numbers and letters

Hmm good idea... can i add it and credit you?

this might be a noob quiestion but whats a pjer.

this might be a noob quiestion but whats a pjer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It stands for pile jumper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

what they do is they watch a fight between 2 people and right when one of them dies the pjer jumps the winner while he's low on health and picking up the kill and thus the pjer gets drops for both of them... very noobish IMO and whats even worse is when they yell pwn3d st00pid n33b

Instead of making it every 1500 of your item gathered, make it maybe 15,000 (number may need to be changed) on the WHOLE SERVER that your on. Autoers can't track what EVERY single person is doing so they wouldn't know when its coming. When the combined total is 15,000, everyone who is gathering something through a skill like Fishing would get your little code thing.

I like the autoer idea, but I dislike the pjer idea.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The person who had invunerability could simply ica barrage and whip kill someone very quickly before their time ran out correct? Then they would get another minute added...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dunno just scares me :ohnoes: .

wow, a very nice idea, but the numbers will have to be all different colored, sized, and fonted because some autoing programs have a little censor that can solve most of all random events...

I like the idea, it would certainly help slow the autoers. But for all the people who complain about autoers (and I'm not saying this thread is complaining), just find the "report abuse" button. If everybody in the fishing guild were to report all the autoers, Jagex couldn't possibly ignore all those reports. Just keep on hitting that button when you see an autoer. Sooner or later they'll get banned.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Did that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"You may only report every 60 seconds! Do not abuse this system."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The macroer I reported got hit by the frog random though, and failed to respond.

Lets talk about the pjers aight. See you are pking in a small group, and you are getting owned by a large team. You kill your mate, take his stuff and get away. Pjers are just a part of runescape. there's nothing much to do about. And I do know what I'm talking about, I lost a whip to a pjer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now for the marcoers: Most are chinese guys handling 10-15 accounts at the same time on the same computer. They are called GPFarmers. They get paid 2 or 3 dollar a day doing this. Then they have to give all they collected to a collector who sells it in world 1 or 2. The collector trades the runescapemoney to another account, making it hard to detect. Common used is droptrading. The third account sells it on for real life money. So my point, autoers aren't really autoers, they are just not watching that account at the time. If you ban one, they just make a new one. Sad to say but this problem will only grow larger. Randoms won't hold them

I dont see the point. :-k .. even if an autoer/macroer fell for this they would just go back to where they were fishing and start fishing again... not like they wear anything and/or anything expensive in ther ebag except some fish.... :?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So i see no point in this IMO.