anonymous1234

11

11862. *gulp* that's a lot of episodes, and I can't even watch them now because my sister left iTunes on, and her username was a password so I cant close it :wall:

DAMNIT. I

6

if you think that's bad, don't even try watching QVC.

3?! THIS...IS...FOUR

Lol they let them do that but the trojan pig commercial is banned :roll: "in local news, child molestor is praised for raising self esteem of local homosexual boy billie thomas, after having sex with him. the boy had this to say; 'he was so nice to me, and didn't think I was ugly like everybody else.' Could child molestation be a new cure for teenage depression and help lower suicide rates? Find out more at foxnews.com" :? Maybe I got a little too in to it

more. This thread got deleted in the rollback, but I'm not 100% sure when the original thread was. I don't think being secret about the logo is going to do anything if it is visible at 0%. People will find a way, and destroy it. Focus on making artwork and perhaps getting infinite ink, then we can try again ;)

11868. Yeah, I'm up to episode 35 of RvB. How many are there total? Favorite quote: he could be captured...or dead!...Or captured AND dead.

2

again. we know, and don't care. You fail at getting attention more than a troll. We aren't going to start flaming you for vandalizing.

agreed. and dastroy ball or w/e you want to call yourself, we are losers, not [developmentally delayed]s #-o

it's completely covered, they have more recruits than ever, and we are constantly losing supporters, or they get ip resets. we're done :wall:

11873.00000000000000000000000

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

The only thing she has been in charge of is Alaska.... Yeah, certainly a lot of experience there :? . Yeah I don't think McCain could have chosen a worse running mate. What is even worse is that, if he wins, there is a decent chance (with how old he is) that she could very well become a president. It's just a scary thought. Now THAT would be the cause of the 2012 apocalypse

7, the number of 1/3 of the jackpot

Wow, that's it. You've cracked it. Man, why didn't anyone think of this sooner? I tell you what Joe, perhaps you're the God we've all been looking for. I for one am a Christian and believe Jesus is real. Now Joe, to answer your question, he did not create these things. This is a world controlled by Satan, which is why there are all these bad events and people out in the world. The word sin, is a word meaning to disobey God or breaking one of the 10 Commandments. Satan has been here ever since the creation of the Earth when he tempted Adam and Eve. They ate the Fruit of Knowledge, which allowed them to see like God. They saw they were nude, covered themselves, and God wondered why they were hiding. He found out that they disobeyed his word, prior to Him telling them that you must not eat from that tree. He banished them, and we are descendants of Adam and Eve. Basically there is all this craziness in the world because Satan controls this Earth. If you are wondering, why can't God just kill him. Well he could, except that He said He'd never kill an Angel. Satan is a fallen Angel who was banished from heaven, thus creating Hell, where sinful men and women go. The only way to avoid Hell is to repent your sins, or ask God for forgiveness, and gladly God will forgive you and accept you as His child again. This is what I believe, and none of you can change it, unless I messed up on a technical part. If God is the God you are saying, then why couldn't he just change reality so satan and hell never existed, and all humans did not sin yet still had free will?

Am I the only one who got that picture? I did, but I want to see somebody make a motifake out of that and see how bad it is :lol:

no. 11876

:twss: :twss:

Any light moving away (or to, for that matter) from an observer would cause red shift. The light wouldnt move any faster or slower, the wavelength would change. More specifically, light moving towards an observer would cause blue shift, though the link probably says that. I'm still confused, because if the astronaut is moving .999...c, and shines a light, wouldn't the light move 1c relative to the astronaut, which would be 1c + the .999...c of the spaceship, which is impossible.

You mean because there weren't Elites in 3? Technically, the H3 brutes had shields, I think. And The Maw was the shiz, man. At point I could actually close my eyes and walk myself through the entire level- not on the actual game, I'd get killed firing blind, but I knew the entire level layout :lol: The fun thing about 343 Guilty Spark was that there a bunch of stuff to find, too. I remember I had had the game for months, and one day my friend told me about something he had found in that level that I;d never seen; that room with an elevator, but the elevator just keeps screaming downwards (and explodes, I think). Of course, it took ages for him to find it again to show me.... I got lost every time I played 343 Guilty Spark. me too. I even tried using a video walkthrough and got lost, but the text ones are more helpful because of how in-detail they can get. (ex: turn right at the dead grunt body and hug the wall, don't fall into the flood below)

I'm not sure I quite understand what you mean. From the perspective of the stationary observer, the light is traveling at the same velocity as the spaceship (well, it's moving 0.0001c faster). Well in this situation I imagined the spaceship going away from the observer, and the astronaut holding the torch shines it directly at the observer. Now I'm really confused #-o

Imagine that there is a spaceship traveling at a constant velocity of 0.9999...c through a vacuum, and stationary observer watching the spaceship. At the tip of this spaceship is an astronaut holding a torch. When the astronaut turns on the torch, what happens to the light given off? What happens to the light differs depending on which observer you are--let's start with the stationary observer. Given that the spaceship is practically traveling at the speed of light, and that light cannot exceed 3 x 10^8 m/s, the stationary observer sees the light given off from the torch traveling at the same speed as the spaceship. However, what the astronaut observes is different. The astronaut observes the light from the torch moving out from the spaceship at 1c, relative to the velocity of the spaceship. One would think that this would mean that from the perspective of the astronaut, the light coming off from the torch is traveling at 1.9999...c, but it's not. For this to make sense, I'll use another analogy. Imagine you are in a car traveling on a perfectly smooth road, with the windows covered up to the extent that no light is being let in, and you have earplugs on so that you can not hear sound coming from outside the car. In other words, your senses are completely limited to what is happening in the car. The car is traveling at a constant velocity. In other words, the car is not accelerating in any direction. If you were in this car, you would not know if you were traveling 5 m/s, 5000 m/s, or if you were not even moving. If you are traveling at a constant velocity, you need to have outside reference points (things moving at a different velocity to you) to know how fast you're going. This is the basis of Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity. The spaceship, and therefore the astronaut, are traveling at a constant velocity, and so is the source of the light (the torch). From the perspective of the astronaut, who in relation to the stationary observer is traveling at 0.999...c, the light is traveling at 1c. Our logic would tell us that this is incorrect as a ray of light can not be traveling at two different velocities at the same time. According to Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity, the astronaut flashing the torch from his frame of reference, and the astronaut flashing to torch from the stationary observer's frame of reference are not the same events--they are simultaneous events. The basis of Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity is that things are relative, in that they are not absolute, but dependent on the observer. I apologize if I didn't so a good job of explaining it. It's sort of tricky to get your mind around, but it makes sense once you get it. So if the light is traveling 1c relative to the astronaut, and the astronaut is traveling .999...c, couldn't the light not be moving relative to the stationary observer? :anxious: