Jump to content

Kaizer11

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Videogames, soccer.
  1. I'm still waiting for that cabbage armor jagex promised a couple of years ago :/
  2. The chances that someone actually does that to be in the top 200 are very small. If that does happen there's a very high change the guy will mess up and gain some extra exp, as well as there's a lot of people who can tell if he's seen in member worlds, etc. There's many ways to bust cheaters in this matter. Ehh, no. The chances are huge, specially if that person is desperate. It is quite easy to cover up being P2P. Simple enough: get better friends who won't rat you out or turn chat to offline. However, when you become P2P, extra options are added to the "Recover a Stolen/Locked Account" stuff. Previously (never p2p), you wouldn't see any membership asking records but if the account was ever p2p, it will ask... -.- But now these things show up randomly, even if the person has actually never been a member, so now there's no point to state about it.
  3. The chances that someone actually does that to be in the top 200 are very small. If that does happen there's a very high change the guy will mess up and gain some extra exp, as well as there's a lot of people who can tell if he's seen in member worlds, etc. There's many ways to bust cheaters in this matter.
  4. And I think you missunderstood the fact that nobody cares if you get a lvl on f2p or p2p. It's been said many times in this thread that a medium lvl f2p is not impressive at all, but what happens when you meet a lvl 124 with ten 99 skills that happens to have never been a member? It would certainly impress me a lot because that situation doesn't happen frecuently, specially on the free worlds.
  5. The best part of the day has come :D 8 ranks up o.O
  6. I myself am a lvl 112 "100% F2P" and I can tell you, I don't consider my status an achievement. Being "100% f2p" is just one of the hundred ways you can play the game, just like when you make a str pure to BH or a def pure to show off a full sara on a lvl 19 account. In my opinion, this whole discussion resolves on the fact that there are a lot of people think that higher leveld players should have been a member at one point or another. But how about some who have never enjoyed p2p status, and to boot happens to have higher stats than your average lvl 100 member? I lost count on how many times I have been asked "why no cape?" or called "Liar, u must be p2p" just because I have spent a little more time playing the game, raising the skills a member would have got in half the time. All this makes you think that F2P might be somewhat harder than being a member, but that's it. Also, I'd like to point out that having restrictions makes a game more challenging. For example, you have to think your way around skills that have a limited ammount training methods, also money is harder to get as well (money is actually easy to come by, but in members it is even easier), that kind of stuff.
  7. I think it can only be changed by the creator of the topic.
  8. http://hiscore.runescape.com/hiscoreper ... r1=arvys13 Sadly, Rolff is right.
  9. If jagex wanted HD to be a members only feature, they might have already mentioned it in the main page. they made the BETA members only and promised it will be released for everyone once the BETA period is over. Sure, Full-Screen function will most likely be P2P only.
  10. What you think F2P get? Hopefully the whole package, but... Just some features, or all the package like P2P? ... If F2P gets it, then the members will complain, so... How will you react if F2P won't have full screen? ... It's not like I'll quit, or get members. If I don't get FS just because there needs to be some space for the adds, I'll most likely deal with it and continue as always.
  11. Finally passed the minimun. ^_^ Add Kaizer11 (1293 total) please.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.