What the fuc* are you talking about? 300 is the best epic war movie I've ever seen. And this, what you called "unrealisticly ripped" is a real masterpiece. It should not be realistic it should remind people on comic book also thats the reason why they've muted some colours to follow comic book style. If you wanna see realistic movie go watch some real movies like "Troy". 300 is animated movie and it was harder to make these characters in 3D world then record scenes in real life :wall: . The problem with 300 is that it's all style and no substance. Visually it's impressive but apart from that there is very little that would make it a great war film. It has the flimsy of plots (it may be roughly based on history but the majority of this isn't explored), basically it's a single battle scene of 1Hr 40Mins and only 20Mins of setting the scene, creating some sort of feasable plot (okay the numbers aren't entirely accurate but thats how it felt. Also while it's 'comic book style', it shouldn't matter - even films shot in a 'comic book style' have to have certain key components like plot. Sin City for example was shot in a similar style but was done well. Also using this style an actors job is excactly the same as it would be if it had been shot in any other way so I don't understand how it's "harder to make these characters in 3D world." To me 300 follows the same trend as alot of other recent films, it's relies far too much on fancy computerised graphics and leaves key aspects such as plot & direction as an afterthough. The problem is that audiences (myself included) are drawn to these films regardless of quality as they make good looking trailers & therefore are a great money spinner for studios. All true but Its still fun to watch if you like that kind of movie.