Jump to content

superkev360

Members
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. First: We only have 1 person go out of bounds, and only 1 person was complained about early on, you guys had 1 person go out of bounds too. Unless you have a PICTURE of more than just 009 Leo Sk or a video or ANY sort of proof to that claim, you can stop using false support to justify a fight you think you won but you didn't. Don't make a Claim without Proof, that's how Tip.It and RSC works, "NO PIC NO PROOF", it's a pretty common rule. I really do think your "eyes are deceiving you". Second: Your more than silly mate, <3: [spoiler=RE's DC][17:57:06] * Now talking in #relites [17:57:06] * Topic is 'xXxXxX Welcome to #Relites If you want to visit Runescape Elites offical IRC channel type this: /Server -m irc.seersirc.net and then if you have connected type /join #Relites. Our forums can be found at www.Runescape-Elites.com XxXxXx' [17:57:12] <Vannaka> Hell of a Fight, :D [17:58:31] <%Ssiidd> !clan Vannaka& [18:00:42] <%Niall> hi Vannaka [18:00:47] <%Niall> we had like 2 dcs :( [18:00:52] <Vannaka> Hey [18:00:58] <Vannaka> Aww [18:01:00] <%Niall> well 1 confirmed dc [18:01:07] <%Niall> the other we dont know if it was dc or ko [18:01:12] <%Niall> they wont admit it XD [18:01:28] <Vannaka> lol [18:01:39] <Vannaka> Hell of a Fight though [spoiler=SE's DC][16:22:12] <Vannaka|War> did you DC yesterday [16:22:14] <Vannaka|War> or get KO'd [16:22:17] <Ruhul> dc [16:22:19] <Ruhul> :\ [16:22:20] <Vannaka|War> oh ok Both sides had 1 CONFIRMED DC. You can stop saying "DC's" as it's more than 2 or something cause that's not what RE said. Third: Little light to your Knowledge, 1. We Warred on w118, a GMT(Sweden) world, picked by RE. - SE had no problem warring on this world, the DC on both sides was Unlucky. 2. We we're Outlevel'd quite a lot. 3. RE used trees in SouthWest corner and we had no idea/NEVER used those tree's as bounds before in any of our ~55 Fights or so, so they had that advantage as well. 4. It was kill for kill for practicly the whole fight, until the end and was about 1 hour and 10 minutes. If you wanna keep going then fine by me, go ahead, but your only damaging RE's honorable image and excellent reputation at Matched Wars by trolling. Finally~ It was a great fight, but even with an even number of dis-advantages from both sides, SE won fair & square. We had multiple DC's, what one person says on IRC does not necessarily represent the truth. I really don't get your point by what you're trying to say here, the southwest trees have always been within the boundaries. You'd might of had 55 wars but we've been around for multiple years and have been using those threes pretty much all the time since the boundaries were even made. We were DDed there at the start so you could figure that you could use them either way. The trees he went out of at the start made an impact and we just had bad luck at crucial points. Not trying to take away your win but it's not 'sheer quality' and 'excellent prepping' that made you win; you're a CWA clan who picked 20 people out of what, 50? for a CWA fight. Doubt levels would of mattered that much seeing you picked all of your CWA experts :lol:. As has been said before we were having quite the advantage at the start til that DC, where we managed to pull it even til we had another one.. was not a KO lol. I really couldn't care less about what people think about us, I'm merely stating facts as they are and if you want to argue them go ahead, I don't care. I could take this boundaries crap way further but luckily I'm too mature for that kind of behaviour :lol:. We also had a d/c that is how you guys got that one person lead in the first place.
  2. If losted was a word I could probably tell you. We've lost 7 times since we started keeping count, and won 48-49 times It would become 8 if you'd fight 2m around 3 est weekday for sure lmfao cool story we dont war at 3est we are est on a weekday nice try tho why are u scared to war on a weekend?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.