Everything posted by VEGHATERMEATLOVER
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
Ok, for this new hegemony I want to know a couple of things, just answer yes or no to them. Shall we start with no technology at all, not even how to make iron or bronze and then over time we will get to the stage we are at at the moment in a long long time. Or shall we start with the the same technology as we have now and then add continuations to that. I believe no tech would be the best, y'no like civalisation starts and then we could actually create a new sort of culture with diffrent types of weapons and objects for each culture. Bear in mind if you want to even make a gun your going to have to research medium complexity machinery metal work creation of gunpowder creation of steal/iron whatever but in a true steampunk style this would encourage invention and out of the box thinking it would also allow for abut of survialism. (y/n) idea stealing? Should we be allowed to beat someone up and steal all of there techs? I think so (y/n) do we want random events or rebellions based on how you treat your people. (y/n) can we put a ban on huge alliances consisting of nearly the entire game. (y/n)
-
Dungeoneering
Murphys law?
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
No, I think were all dead set on having a new hegemony.
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
There goes my plans to turn the moon into a gigantic nuclear bomb thrower. No... Keep the moon. It'll be the source of much humor in times to come, also, can we make a rule against fallout and lasting WMDs
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
Earth and the moon, that'll be fun.
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
</Rantflame> Archi, I loved Reading through all off your ridiculously long posts, it was like a story. But strange matter, that was a real cheat. I mean, that just defied physics and then Ross's, oh don't worry. I'll use a random number generator - Yay! Hit uranium. Pretty accurate Dusty.
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
We tried that. It didn't work. Nobody wants to accept that they lost. Ever. That's why we have the main mod, and a second combat mod, and they both decide who won. in the origional hegemony they're basically was no mods and everyone was equal, thats another reason why hegemony v2 failed. Everyone argues, it's all part of the fun.
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
We tried that. It didn't work. Nobody wants to accept that they lost. Ever. Then there needs to be an easy to understand system. The OP/mod decides (but then it would be unfair if s/he plays) Based on a democratic vote within the thread.
-
Zombie Plans-Revised
There are times for dispelling logic and times for not dispelling logic. A good time for dispelling logic would be during a marketing or product design brainstorm. A bad time of dispelling logic would be during a zombie apocalypse when your life is in danger. I suppose this zombie thing must be gods new idea of natural selection.
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
So Rocco's leader de facto unless someone wants his spot. Trol, I suggest we start with a borderless map and a single circle to significant military ownership and yeh, no space. I'm sick of sci-fi Also, no silly combat system. The members will decide who wins based on logic.
-
Zombie Plans-Revised
Earthsage, no they didn't.
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
Basically, politically no-one is more powerful then anyone - whoever controls America won't be anymore powerful then anyone else. I think instead of the Borders we have at the moment I believe we should have just a borderless map where people can fill in there own Borders, that'll add a bit of intrest. The technology should start at 1960, that way it'll take use longer to reach rayguns and all that [cabbage].
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
Grim, I've read it and I didn't like it. It's going to have to be Rocco, dusty isn't that active Infact, no mods. Have things decided by majority vote and allow people to say "vote this or I'll destroy your country" like the origional hegemony where the leader had left long ago. And in this new hegemony let's put bans on crap, I mean - Strange matter (which will allow me to create whatever I want but I'll pretend to use a random numbe generator to make it fair)... No way!) and let's start in 1960 and have 2 days = a year.
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
It's going to have to be Rocco, dusty isn't that active.
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
Now that empires up, who's for hegemony classic? Doom, if this is about that heat thing we might aswell forget it. The hegemony collapsed because of space, when it's in space it's not the hegemony anymore it's a boring sci-fi game. We should definitly restart on earth.
- Last one to post wins
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
Also, space for me makes me feel or sci-fi(ey) and I don't like sci-fi, earth can cater to all audiences. Can we please rethink.
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
Oh yeh :L We should be on earth, thats what we loved about the hegemony, all this new fangled space ships and stuff is just not as fun as it was back in the old days. As soon as we hit the second thread it all went downhill. The reason for that is the fact that everyone is spread out in time.
-
Hegemony Argument Thread
If Archi lets me join dibs on Greenland. I suppose due to my behaviour last time i'm not allowed to take dibs on Germany?
-
Zombie Plans-Revised
That.... Is going in my sig! But seriously, can we not bully Earthsage
-
The Non-Magical Arena
Mather or Pie or a new person need to post for the game to restart.
-
Dungeoneering
Hey, you forgot the robe I got and the staff those wizards got me. It should be that. [Hide=Hui][hide=stats] Athletics .4 Fire magic: 0.1 Force Magic: 0.1 Regenerative Magic 0.2 [/hide] [hide=Inventory] Power gloves Magic Robe Staff [/hide] [/hide] And you didn't give me any XP from regenerating my arm.
-
Dungeoneering
:), so I get the spirit. Right come with me green spirit beause your all confused.
-
Dungeoneering
Ninja
-
Dungeoneering
"We are not spirits of the dead! We are beings of other worlds. Why should we help you? We're quite content here."... just quoting you, LOGICAL LOOP!