death666bl00ms

Sorry if this has been posted already, I did a search for it, but couldn't find anything. Is it just my computer? When I go to runescape.com, there is no longer a button for members play. I am forced to click on the general "play now" button, which directs me to a page with a RS ad up top, in red. From there, I switch to members only worlds. However, the ad stays. Any advice on how to get the members button back so I can ditch this ad? Also, is this a new thing?

It boosts you. You get over 100 str. I believe it is 116, but I don't remember. Haven't taken one in awhile.

No way I could have done that....I mean, I would get fired from my job, and my girlfriend would leave me. Do you not have any other responsibilities in your life right now?

Just dumped my yellow and picked up an Arcane.

I am 22, will be turning 23 in September. I just finished my final Econ exam, and will receive my Bachelor of Arts in Economics from the University of Maryland on Friday. I also start my job as a contract specialist for the United States Navy, at the Patuxent River Naval Air Base on July 20. I am well past econ 101. I will try to refrain from having intellectual discussions for you.

That's low. Really low. I really can't hold an educated argument with someone with this level of respect. Once again. You flung mud, but didn't want it thrown at you. There's a difference between telling someone to study up on their economics and making a personal insult to someone's intelligence. I was just fine with you telling me to study economics... I've only taken a year of it, and I still believe my arguments hold water. When you say I won't understand something, though... that's no longer insulting simply knowledge of economics. The issue I had was not the lack of understanding. The issue was you flat out telling me I was wrong, and insulting me. I did not start that. The "kthxby" was meant to be taken as a joke, nothing more. I'm sorry if I was short. I am currently studying for my final Econ exam, which is tmw...

That's low. Really low. I really can't hold an educated argument with someone with this level of respect. Once again. You flung mud, but didn't want it thrown at you.

First of all, the demand curve is only completely flat if the demand is perfectly elastic. Because no demand can ever be perfectly elastic (unless it has an equal substitute, which this does not), the line will always curve at least slightly downward. We both agree that, if the demand curve is sloping downward, the prices will rise when supply falls. And I lost all respect when you said "kthxbye." You went from an educated person debating with me to an arrogant person having an argument. It was a joke dude. Tbh, I was upset when you insinuated I was uneducated, and needed a "class in economics" to begin to speak about it, without even understanding what I was saying. Hence, you treat me with arrogance, I return it. I'm done with this convo. You were quick to jump on what I was saying, no real need to continue to point out the inaccuracies in your argument. You wouldn't understand them anyway.

And btw, both supply and demand can shift at the same time, resulting in no price change. Seriously: REVIEW SUPPLY AND DEMAND.

Look at this pic: If supply rises or falls, how does price raise? Kthxbye

:wall: Two things. 1: The first part is you repeating what I was saying (after you told me to "take a class in economics"). 2: DEMAND DOES NOT HAVE TO BE CURVED DOWN. Demand can be completely horizontal.

I'm not quite sure you understand the concept of supply and demand then. Just because there is a less supply of something does not mean it is worth more/more of a demand for it. Put it to you this way. I just drew a picture of a stickfigure, with one arm. Only picture in the world like that. Sell it to you for $1m? I don't think so...No demand for it. It is about supply and demand. If yellow is rising faster than green, then there is more of a demand for yellow. Quoting so you understand the context of what I was saying. One Mona Lisa = limited supply, high demand = high price. One stick figure, drawn by Bobby Morse = limited supply, low demand = low price. Less supply does not equal more demand. EDIT: Just because you are probably going to jump on that above quote. Less supply does not equal more demand. Limited supply BY ITSELF does not increase a products worth. And btw, a demand curve does not have to curve. Elasticity much?

And actually, yes, it does. Please take economics before you lecture us about supply and demand. In the short run, demand for the item does not change, although quantity demanded does.

And actually, yes, it does. Please take economics before you lecture us about supply and demand. In the short run, demand for the item does not change, although quantity demanded does. You missed my point. Completely. Take that picture. Even though there is just one picture (supply extremely limited), the worth does not raise much. You took that quote out of context. Reread it. And btw, I graduate in 3 days with a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from the University of Maryland.

I'm not quite sure you understand the concept of supply and demand then. Just because there is a less supply of something does not mean it is worth more/more of a demand for it. Put it to you this way. I just drew a picture of a stickfigure, with one arm. Only picture in the world like that. Sell it to you for $1m? I don't think so...No demand for it. It is about supply and demand. If yellow is rising faster than green, then there is more of a demand for yellow. I do understand supply and demand, the only reason why yellow partyhat's value is close to green partyhat's value after 8 years is because of Grand Exchange. Before GE people can set prices for their hat and it will eventually steady out at equilibrium. They can set prices all they want, however, in a Capitalist market, supply/demand will determine the price. Your "settling out at the equilibrium" is where the supply and demand curves cross. If i have a green partyhat back then, I would try to sell it at much higher rate because there is less of it. You can try all you want. Bottom line is: If there is no demand for that color, you ain't gonna get that huge price.GE however, force both yellow and green to grow at the same rate Since there are more yellow partyhats, there are more transactions daily. Whereas green partyhat has a transaction every other day. This means the average price of yellow partyhat grows on daily bases and the average price of green partyhat only grows every other day. This is how yellow starts to catch up to green after GE was introduced. Not because people love yellow more (that is only the perception right now, thanks to GE). Perception or not, demand is still growing for the yellow. If what you are saying is true, then people would be offering a much higher price for greens on the forum. They aren't. There is a higher demand for yellows then greens. (Regardless of whether or not the GE stimulated that demand, the demand is still there.) Like I said, for many years Green has always been valued higher than yellow. Why is it only until now did people start to dislike green partyhats? Like I said, you don't really understand supply and demand. You are too hung up on supply.

I'm not quite sure you understand the concept of supply and demand then. Just because there is a less supply of something does not mean it is worth more/more of a demand for it. Put it to you this way. I just drew a picture of a stickfigure, with one arm. Only picture in the world like that. Sell it to you for $1m? I don't think so...No demand for it. It is about supply and demand. If yellow is rising faster than green, then there is more of a demand for yellow.

Haha, my old pure laaag is still working... :lol:

That's sarcasm i assume :P +1

I can't imagine why you are still muted!

Lol, I'm not saying that more people die from weed then alcohol. I'm saying it was highly amusing that the person wrote ZERO people die from weed.... I know that there is a higher amount of alcohol-related deaths then marijuana-related deaths, I just found it amusing that the person would say that no one dies from weed.

So, am I the only one who gets annoyed when I see people make up facts or statistics? I especially liked seeing the one that said 400,000 people die from alcohol every year and 0 die from weed. I laughed for a good five minutes on that one....then I called my gf, and we both laughed for another five.

Fixed

I believe most of that pricing was due to staking. It gave stakers items to use for staking, and since everyone used the same basis of items which wouldn't increase in supply it helped the pricing. Always nice to have a currency that only seems to increase in worth. However, some pkers might want some rares to look pretty. :lol: The reason the stakers were using rares was because (at that time) rares were the only item worth an obscene amount. Some stakers had more money then was allotted (More then the 2,7B, or whatever arbitrary amount it is), and needed to place their money somewhere. EDIT: Changed "there" to "their"

Think I should get Armadyl? Or is it not worth it...

Ok guys. Thanks for the advice. I think I'm going to try rune xbow, with broad bolts. Thanks guys!