Resistance

Its an adventure illustrated through MS paint drawings. Somebody would tell the character what to do and I would draw it. http://www.mspaintadventures.com/ Like above but you have a greater degree of choice.

Is anybody here interested in a MSpaint adventure? I might run one.

Iey, I was thinking that if not enough people cast their votes I could combine the acts of two people or alternatively roll a dice? Leiana, I don't really know how else to do it, but its fun to get people involved in my opinion. I could have it so that people post what they want the person to do and then if somebody agrees then it'll occur. --

Archi, could you please give me a summary of my skills?

If she gets scared by things like that she shouldn't watch it. I don't really understand why she is choosing to watch it. Its like shooting yourself in the foot.

She shouldn't watch it then.

Is anybody interested in an MSpaint adventure type of game? In which one character is controlled by the votes of players. Sort of like homstuck.

How much? What do you work as?

Girls also have a weak spot: their breasts. This reputably is worse then getting hit in testicles but I don't believe that

You could have entered REM sleep immediately due to REM rebound which occurs after long periods of wakefulness.

I have died 2/3 of the time.

Lost 1.0, I haven't written my skills down yet so will make a decision when they're made avalible.

Yes, but the problem is: what if pornography was legal to be viewed by somebody under 16 in that country but because of your laws it enforces a law not present in your country. So your laws of the internet wouldn't create any freedom, simply diminish it. [hide=Possibly NSFW] [/hide] Because necrophilia does no harm it is your subjective opinion that it is bad, different cultures believe different things about it. This is an issue for the governments to decide, the internet should be free domain for all things apart from things that are objectively morally wrong. Its for the parents to monitor, the internet shouldn't make any restrictions based on beliefs. If the parents deem it is suitable then it is suitable. Although it is unlikely that any parent would let their children gamble it is still wrong for the internet laws to make choices that are really up to the company, country or parents.

Here are the issues I have found. Does §3.2 contradict §1.0? In some countries pornography is illegal and I the age of legal viewing is different (could be 18, 21 or even younger) If the age of consent is lower then your 'laws of the internet' actually diminish already existing freedoms. I can understand that §3.0 is used to protect animals and humans, however what is the problem with human or animal remains? Although it may be a taboo, if the person (animals have no sense of respect for the dead so it is irrelevent) chooses to be used for that use or even if it is lawful in that area of the globe you are restricting people based on your own ideals. §4.1 So basically the catholic child abuse cases are illegal to discuss on the internet? §4.0 so every single negative opinion the web? I understand this is not your intent but you haven't specified what harmful is. §5.0 yet again an example of your own ideals governing the internet, this is for the country to decide. For example in Germany, online gambling is illegal. §6.1 Why 13? Why not 12? Why not 14? Most countries have decided upon 18 or 16 being the legal age of an adult.

If a girl doesn't understand that I like playing videogames then I'm going to dump her.

In that case it should be locked.

Oh in that case you've probably found the right person. Edit: I don't know whether to italicise the 'probably' or not, it seems sarcastic when I do it. I mean to stress word on the probably because I can't say it for sure. As a full unitalicised sentence it sounds reassured and arrogant but with an italic it sounds rude and arrogant. In context I mean 'well, you don't seem to be displaying any of the traits that I was on about' so you've probably found the right person but I cannot be sure due to lack of information, but as a general rule it is a waste of time to try and woo somebody - if you don't get on, you will probably never get on to a sufficent point that you want a relationship together. Edit2: Mather, I think because stereotypical American teens speak like that.

I think that I'm speaking quite generally but what I mean is that if you have to ask for help proceeding then you obviously don't feel fully comfortable with him or her. I think one of the main factors of a relationship is 'clicking'. If you've talked to him/her and you haven't instantly clicked and still need further help pursuing then I expect that it is fairly likely that you have failed.

If you need relationship advice then she's probably not the right one.

Lets not get back into relationship advice.

Archi, do you plan to continue to run these sessions on Thursdays? Thursdays are more conveniant for me.

Sorry, I didn't realise that I was doing it.

I meant the same thing by it. 'people won't be annoyed because longbows exist' 'people would expect longbows to exist'

I would be wiling to run this if I get four players :) Otherwise lock.