Jump to content

Jordyy

Members
  • Posts

    106
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

3 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    All Over The UK

RuneScape Information

  • RuneScape Status
    P2P
  1. Gemeos, not that I will have max cape by Tuesday but out of curiosity how many hours would I have left to all 99. Skills left being; 98 Strength (12.3M) 96 Range (10.2M) & 91 Defence (6.1M). Or anyone else who could answer this thanks!
  2. Can't get on website without laptop freezing. [bleep]ing shite update
  3. I did slayer again the other day after a few months of not doing it. Never did it hard but I noticed in my whole fire giant task I lost 0lp. They were aggressive and extremely afkable. Has anyone else noticed this? I wasn't paying attention to any exp rates though.
  4. It's only been mentioned three times in two pages, so it's pretty clear to see why you'd have missed it. :-| I know. Which is why he should have been fined for the theft of her commodities in addition to that. I didn't 'miss' anything, you just misinterpreted what I said. I know he didn't actually receive any penalty for the theft of her RS stuff. I am saying that the sum total of his fine should have at least matched the value of what he stole. I disagree with the court not fining the guy for the theft of virtual goods as I view them in exactly the same way as physical commodities, as my previous post explains. Which is why a £100 fine seems low to me. By this logic, should the 'commodities' we earn in-game not be subject to taxation, since they allegedly have a real value and therefore qualify as a source of income? Or... we could just accept that all in-game items remain owned by Jagex and avoid a lot of complications. Baring in mind that RS gold only has a value when you sell it, which involves breaching the terms and conditions of playing the game. RS Gold has a real cash value whether you are interested in selling it or not. For the sake of argument let's say the price of eoc gold is £0.15/M. If you have 500M then it is worth approximately £75 whether you intend to sell it or not. If I have no intentions of selling my Sony stocks or my gold bullion (I wish I actually owned these things), those things still have a value. Virtual currency is no different. You don't pay tax on commodities you own, you only pay tax on your income from those commodities. If I had a pile of gold bars sitting in my room, I wouldn't pay tax on them as I derive no income from them. Same with a pile of RSGP. It is only when you sell those items - real or virtual - that you obtain a taxable income from them, although that does not stop those items from having a value. Whilst I don't dispute that all in game items are owned by Jagex, Jagex has shown a remarkably small interest in preventing the sale of those items. Less than 100 people have been banned for RWT in the past 12 months; and at a conservative estimate, of the order of tens of thousands of unique accounts have bought or sold virtual items for real currency in the last year using the most popular black market site alone. More likely that number is far higher. Until Jagex show more interest in taking action against people selling items they own, the fact that they own them is effectively irrelevant in the same way that a law enforced in fewer than 1% of cases would be irrelevant. You would have to sell a substantial amount of gp in order for it to become taxable. That's providing you declare it of course - I think you can store £20,000 in a paypal account. We're talking over 120B gp of gold at the price you said. If you bought and sold you would have to sell even more for it to become taxable. I think a bigger issue would be if you were able to sell over £75,000 of it. You would legally have to charge VAT on all UK sales. But I think that if you could even get to that point would only be applicable to the difference of price bought/sold. Example if you bought £100 worth and sold for £105. Then £5 would be vatable making £6 the gross amount.
  5. Is that not the same Makaveli who used to post on this thread a year back or so?
  6. It is to be hoped that it is for fun as well, like gaining cosmetic items. Internet respect seems to be bigger now. And just as absurd as taking oneself seriously in all respects. How is taking oneself too seriously absurd? Surely if you can't appreciate yourself how can you expect others too?
  7. I personally would just read ImDustinHoffmanIRL's posts.
  8. I think that it will be a sad day when SUOMI finishes the last skill. No more wondering if it's possible, but hey I planned on quiting permenantly when 5B was met and to be honest.... I'm not read to quit... :P Can you wait a year? :o
  9. Thank you, I did not know this. How can you disable certain skills? (I think I have 17 99s) Dont worry, found it thank you.
  10. How would you be able to get the dung exp reward everyday? without the luck of getting it chosen everday?
  11. 3.7M exp a day average... jeeeez... that's an average of over 100M exp/month... I might be 'lucky' to get 100M exp in a year.
  12. Is Toony buying summoning exp via SOF?
  13. Next update and Dragonseance could be 11th in the top 15. More likely 12th though, anyone know if he is going for a monthly exp record?
  14. This is why you bank off shore.
  15. I guess you just answered yourself... If I just missed something and you didn't answer yourself: your question might be considered offtopic so I would use the private message system. I worked it out now. My Dung Door exp has got about 50% faster using Demon Butler now. Sorry for off-topicness. Back to topic. Anyone think SUOMI could grab the top wc record?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.