MasterMarduk

I have a white and 4 mask sets and Im going to hold onto them until I really need cash.... which is never lol Actually that makes people that buy skill sell, which lowers the price.

sirhappy2002 - Illinois

I only hold rares to keep my cash away from my spending habits, and while at the same time Increasing in value as demand overtakes supplies. Rares used to be traded mostly with Items for the exchanged becuase the gp required especially for P hats was way more then most people carried ussually. With The updates this has made that impossible as people would also request additional funds for the trade having Items ussually. The rares market right now Is kinda in deep freeze until things get worked out, if they ever do. The GE isnt that great as its prices and such dont seem to be able to keep at the right place, Either to high or to low of what the market is, with the exception of commonly traded Items. Rares will eventually go back up but for now they will be down as there required funds are more then most people can manage, especially in the case of P hats.

If I was still a member Id buy up to lvl 80 for sure lol Just to have lvl 80 lol Ive always bought skills, but I also merchanted along the way the things I no longer needed, which is not impossible lol (my merchanting Involved buying everything and selling back the stuff I dont need in bulk for a little more then I paid to make a profit and cover the stuff I use)

Ill disagree with the meal part mcdonalds is cheap lol but still the point is true. Its already cheap enough, they just need to fix there mistakes.

why would auoters not over saturate the game?its not like a dozen people did it, hundreds of asians were being supported by autoing. why would they care? heres an example, lets say im a real chinese guy working in a PC sweat shop... i use an autoing program to run multiple accounts at once which as i believe is highly likely. (we will exclude a training to willows bot, and so on) WC, 1 cutting willows, 1 cutting magics 1 cutting yews mining, 1 mining iron, 1 P ess fish 1 fishing lobsters 1 fishing sharks flax 1 picking, 1 spinning. dragon killers, 1 green , maybe 1 @ blue. runecrafters maybe 1 doing natures. thats 10 autoers for every single sweatshop worker, now 1k sweat shop workers all around china/korea or just asia in general makes for 10k bots. and bots dont even have to conform to human patterns of, bodily functions. like sleep/eat/restroom. if they all did thise, 1 guy is simply making a variation so that his spots are not over run, he however cannot control other autoers comming to those spots. and some are not even effected by numbers of autoers. P ess doesnt matter how many are their, fishing doesnt really matter, flax is kind of in well supply, spinning bow strings doesnt matter.... also, since jagex would state that the banned 8k autoers one week and 10k some other week. and finally admitted that they banning 20k autoers weekly was simply not news worthy. it must mean their was ALOT of autoers. Just becuase they said they banned them dosent mean that they were always online, Bots like every other account would be used as needed. Once you have 100k yew logs you dont need anymore till you are atleast down to 30k in which case u turn the bots back on and start collecting agian. Bans dosent = acctivity, I also would say that I honestly dont think a farmer would have more then 5 bots going at a time. It would take a very fast computer to do that. Have you ever multied? I tired it once as an experiment, I had 5 or my pures online at once, My computer and Java didnt like it much. Its to hard on both the system and the java application.\ If you have 10 bots on 1 tree let say, the ammount of logs receieved from that tree will be far fewer the more bots you have on it. Thats one reason why you wouldnt see 50 bots on a tree ussually the most was around 5. Any more then that and it becomes redundant and the tree will produce less logs. Getting back to the activity issue, There were far more Bots that were not active then were active, Im saying that at any one time there was no more then 10k active and My guess is there were less. I personnally have around 100 accounts, Out of them 60 I never really used much, 30 of them pures of all kinds for pking and learning, and the other 10 for sellective tasks, mostly my great pure that owned and my main. Only 1 of my 100 was on at a time, even tho I had 100 dosent mean my count would be any higher.

If I was a vengeful gold farmer I wouldnt mess with rares but all the lower cost items, make it so the GE getting totally messed up. Buy all the resources up and sell lower and lower and make bots and have them sell the resources lower till the market and items are worthless.

My beliefs is that its a 3:2:1 ratio, 3 pkers, 2 regular 1 bot. For every 3 pkers that quit 2 regular player did and 1 bot was removed. I really dont think there were over 10k bots just by the areas they liked to use. Oversaturation would lead to a redundency. I also think its about 60k people that have quit/removed, On average when I look its about 60k lower about evey time I look then it used to before the updates. I personally quit because of trade restictions they have placed on me. I also know several people that pked most all the time that quit and they also had several members and non members pures.

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

I think you are missing some big concepts here. You're talking about rules that people are breaking? He's talking about trying to live. Incase you don't get the big picture here, most adults can easily make $200 in a day. Not $180 in a month. Breaking rules isn't the big ussue here. I dont know were you live lol 200 a day? lol I make 280 a week lol thats 5 days a week at 7 an hour 8 hour days, thats before taxes.

Its needed to limit any degridation to society. who says there hasnt been forms of marriage since the begining? theres no evidence either way, or current "thoughts" on "normal" marriage maybe not.

but outside of marriage conditions exist for less then a stable life. Very few societies are able to pull off kids without marriage, and as you see im our societies it leads to state sponcered aid which causes harm to everyone in the form of taxes and money spend on things that could be put to better use if that didnt exist.

Where'd you get that number? for a start the homo genus (no pun intended) has been around for roughly 4 million years. Homo sapien sapiens first showed up less then 100000 years ago. If you meant any type of life, that's also wrong. For animalia showed up around 300 million years ago (may be off by a bit, i took this course a while ago) Earths current human population is over 6 billion. Thousands starve each day, thousands die of diseases we already have cures for, but they can't afford, countries are massively overpopulated, and you're saying that gays will essentially ruin life. It's not like the percentage of homosexuals have gone up, and it seems like humans are one of the most successful animals on the planet, in terms of growth. another thing is is if the homosexuals were straight, and did produce even one child in their lifetime then the population of the world would go up even more. Joy. You and a few other people were saying you hate how all gays are outspoken and flamboyant and whatever, well that's a stereotype. I'm an atheist, and if i were to think that all catholics are like you, just because of a few people, well, then i would think all catholics are ignorant [wagons]. This is where I need to touch on trends, The spartans were one of the greek states that had gay relationships, there tho started when the boys were under 10. Those boys would grow up have kids, but the whole time remain in the military and with there gay compatriots. Paedophilia is something thats present in society, giving gay rights would only encourge this more. No, im not saying all gay men are paedophiles and im not stating all straight men are. Im saying that It will increase the numbers and the chances of someone finally making to seem like its acceptable. So marrying women is acceptable? does that mean the amount of rapes are increased? does that mean we should make it illegal to marry women, so it is more socially unacceptable, so that way there won't be people raping women? This may be a bad comparison, but if drugs were made legal, all the crimes relating to them would cease to exist. Im saying theres evils no matter what, but Marriage with a man and women is needed for out society and species to survive. Anything that isnt that is unneeded and only causes more problems.

i agree rares are silly, and the owners and shallow and pedantic. Did you thesaurus that word (pedantic)? It isn't really used right. It's more related to learning, rather than wealth. Ostentatious would be better. And more generalizations? Rares have sentimental value for some people, rather than just showing off wealth. Others genuinely think they look cool, more so in masks and santas. I personally own a white, and 4 mask sets. I dont think there silly at all, they tend to look rather cool. Though id have to say the prices at which they have hit are rather high. there is a limited number out there but I believe people push it more then demand. I got my white at 155M mask sets at 15M at 30M at 40M at 50M Rares are a status symbol and a why to keep cash you couldnt otherise. There is a GP limit and once you reach it thats it lol Rare both hold value from that and keep money away for when you need it. Think of it like bank interest only you can wear it lol Is bank interest silly? no it smart, people invest in the bank and you get money back Win win.