Kryptic

The KIN! OH NOES

Then why dont you suggest your "idea" to Jagex yourself? why do you have to send it through others?

There is pay by phone for Canadians... not sure for anyone else tho

Hmm..... are you trying to find new ways to market RS membership? And I highly doubt Jagex will ever consider your idea - they make enough money as it is.

Neo pets?! really..? I was actrually tryna draw my rs cat

Read.. So isnt his work :roll: He is not selling because is copyrighted... So maybe someone cares... :wink: Shame on you! ~komodo :P please rate my pixel one that im working on

Dont double post man..... Theres an edit button... Anyway, it looks okay but you didnt make it, so why post a topic for it? Just wanted to see everyones opinion on it - anyway I worked on a new one, because I want one that I made... here is what I got so far..

I gotta be more careful - you cant read saracasim through posts meh..

:( I h8 you...

have no idea, friend sent it to me

Rate it pl0x Forget the siggy - I know buddies are at the bottom of everyone's list, and Im currently working on a better one, so just rate the avy :)

The stupiest thing I have gotten in trouble for is standing in a hallway, inwhich no one is suppose to stand in. I was suspended for 2 days. And whats really really stupid, is that a kid my grade knocked out another kid in grade 10 over a basketball game. The kid has a broken jaw, and suffered a concusion. Guess how many days he got - 1/2.

Its racist if the Kuwaiti's don't give you rights but when Saddam doesn't let his people vote in free elections and kills them because they are Kurds you say he "just has to be tough on them." :roll: I think it's just sad that the Iraqis were suffering when Saddam was in power, and now they have to suffer a lot more when Saddam was captured. But surely it has a better chance of ever becoming peaceful with the current plans? As you said, democracy should be a universal concept, so isn't it better to try and implement it now? Ok, we save the Iraqis from a warlord - but then introduce them to full out war, the strongest over the weak? I dont think you can implement democracy in Iraq ATM, because to have a demorcracy you need everyone to compromise for the sake of the state, which they are not willing to do.

Its racist if the Kuwaiti's don't give you rights but when Saddam doesn't let his people vote in free elections and kills them because they are Kurds you say he "just has to be tough on them." :roll: I totally agree. Demorcracy should be a universal concept, and Saddam was a sick man for the things he did. But without him, the Iraqis are suffering way more than what Saddam did to them. You cant walk outside expecting to come home and be completly fine in Iraq. It's that dangerous - imagine thinking the next car, restaurant, person or mailbox might blow up the next time you walk by it. I think it's just sad that the Iraqis were suffering when Saddam was in power, and now they have to suffer a lot more when Saddam was captured.

I am Palestinian. I know of this issue a great deal... Thats a whole different story, under different circumstances thus it is a whole different thread, thank you. For the record, I stopped posting after that ironic and ignorant reply. In your first post you said you were from Kuwait. Now you are from Palestine. Just where exactly are you from? I am American. I have Irish and Cherokee blood in my veins. I am still American. I was born in Kuwait, but my parents are from Palestine. They left Palestine after their home was destroyed, moved to Jordan - then Kuwait. Kuwaitis were racist and didnt give us much privilages such as recieving kuwaiti citizenship, so we came to Canada. I AM NOT KUWAITI!

Dont know if this is posted yet... but: "An eye for an eye, makes the whole world blind."

There are few, but not enough to prove that UN has been successful... meh. In what ways are the troops aiding Iraq? If you can, give me links to articles - from credible sources of course.

I was on a cruise ship recently and I watched 156 dining room attendants from 43 different nationalities (most third-world) boo at the idea of the U.N. actually "helping" people. Wouldnt be surprised at that. Most nations hate the idea of having their soveriegnty violated. Then why exactly are the US troops in Iraq? They were sent primarily to retrieve Saddam. Mission success - Why are they still in Iraq if they are not helping the people?

Thats what I still remain wondering. If Bush knew what was going to happen before it happened or not, because I did. The shi-ites and sunnis have had problems ever since their existence, and it was predicted that they would fight if Saddam was out of power. *sigh* Bush had no idea what was going to happen. No one does. :roll: Yes, the Shiites and Sunnis have had problems but you forgot about the Kurds. Everyone is struggling for power, and the press only makes the whole mess down there worse. BTW, I'm glad you knew everything that was going to happen. Now that we're there...what else should we do? Leave Iraq to have a civil war? No. Even Hillary Clinton, the most liberal senator out there, said we should stay. :wink: Ok, Americian troops should stay in Iraq. But do you actrually believe thats going to help anything? If the troops are not protecting citizens from war crime, then whats why are the troops even stationed there? Hilary Clinton has the right intensions I believe. She wants the US troops to preform the job of the UN by protecting the innocent - but their not.

Thats what I still remain wondering. If Bush knew what was going to happen before it happened or not, because I did. The shi-ites and sunnis have had problems ever since their existence, and it was predicted that they would fight if Saddam was out of power.

Whatever, its my opinion Im entitled to it.

Like it or not Ghost, its the truth. Saddam did have no choice... Not saying it was the right choice. He still should be tried accordingly. But look at what has happened, once he's gone - hell broke loose. And dont for a minute deny, or disagree with me because you know its true.

No, I didn't say that at all. You again played with my words/misread them/interpreted them wrong - I dont know, I dont care... All I know is you got it wrong. What I was saying (probably 4th time REPEATING myself) is that more Iraqi's are dying faster and in larger amounts than when Saddam was in presidential position. And what I was expecting was people discussing on how such a thing happened, and if there are any possible solutions. This was my intention. Not once did I think this would make anyone thing that I posted a pro-Saddam thread, because I hate him for what he did the same, if not more than you do. :roll: :roll: :roll:

I don't know where you have been - but the Israel/Palestinian conflict has been going on for thousands of years. Did you read that number correctly, THOUSANDS. In the thousands of years its happened, both countries have done terrible things - none worse than the next. The Arabs and Jews have been fighting for the "land of honey" for Thousands of years... The Israel - Palestinian conflict has only been just over 60 years. Not really rellevent., but you corrected me, so I corrected back. Biased, biased, biased....... hokay. Sadly, thats one thing that still remains circumstantial. And this is one thing I probably shouldnt have mentioned due to the lack of evidence. Looking back - I regret it. Gooday.

Wow, I respect you now. CNN, Fox and BBC are probally the most anti-arab stations I have ever seen. What do you know about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? I'd like to find out about your wonderfully-balanced perspective. :lol: What would you like to know? I know lots about how Israels stomp on Palestinians. And you would like us to believe you are an unbiased source of information? And I suppose your unbiased? My opinion is just as unbiased as yours. The difference is I'm not making any assertions that you would like us to believe are "fact." I'm just refuting YOUR lack of evidence. Clearly I'm biased - I'm biased against your ridiculous propaganda. I think its funny that you have spent 6 pages now flooding us with conspiracy theories and yet to show us ONE piece of factual data to support your conclusions. Please, just one. 1. THIS THREAD WAS NOT MADE FOR THE DESCUSSION OF CONSPIRACIES. 2. I dont know where you have been, but Palestinians have been suffering for over 60 years now. I know this because I have familly currently in the fallen state, and I keep as much contact with them as possible. Thats all the evidence I will give on that one. (Im not going into depth with anything, because it's personal - and I dont need to show you evidence to make you happy, because I simply dont care if you believe me or not.) 3. You want proof G Bush is an idiot? Link below - the Goofball is now denying that there is even a Civil War in Iraq... :roll: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington ... bush_x.htm 4. You want proof Palestinians are suffering? Who gave the UN the right to invade on a states Soveriegnty, let alone hand the whole state to a bunch of unwanted group of people. (Unwanted people - Everyone refused their entrance into their state, no one wanted them) Then after the Jews settled in, America gave Israel the means to force Palestinians around the way they wish. They came into their homes, told them they have a set time limit to leave before they blow their house up. How do I know this? Because this is what happened to my familly in Yafah - they lost everything. Plus, the governing body that is suppose to protect citizens from war crimes is doing nothing! The UN is completely ridiculous. The Veto power that the 5 top states have defeats the whole philosophy they are trying to promote. Everytime the UN Securtiy Council recieves any resolution, the US just vetos it, wanting to protect their investment (Israel). The UN doesn't even follow their own conventions specifically the Geneva Convention 1949. Since 1997 Palestinians have have been invoking the Geneva Convention against Israel. The convention was directed at the Jewish occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. But ofcourse Israel captured those regions when Egyptian and Jordanian soldiers went into those areas, aiding the fallen state of Palestine. Resolution 242 was the first to come out. This stated that Israel should withdraw, and return all land back to Palestine. But Israel argued they are only condemned to give back only some terroritories. And they did, but only small regions that are kept far apart from eachother, to limit mobility and contact between the regions they returned. Resolution 181 stated that all Israelss and Arabs should live in peacfully among eachother. But this Resolution became a big deal to the US, because this one in particular brought talk, questioning why was it necessary to even change the name to Israel, when they could just live peacefully together under the original name, Palestine. Lastly, active Sept 15. 2005 the UN now denies that there is even a Israel - Palestinian issue. They state "Palestinian issues stem from Palestinians." -----Excuse me? :roll: In total, I think it to 65 Resolutions came out infront of the Security Council, and not 1 of these were passed through, and were seen as a true problem. http://www.seconddraft.org/ess_palestin ... fering.php ^^^ little more flava for ya 5. Is that enough evidence?! I can digg more if you would like.... Doesn't take much effort for me seeing how I really would like to show you up, because you keep nagging at me. Flame me - But be good at it.