Yoda

I'd like that as well. But where I live nobody buys games, and I doubt I'd have enough money, so it would never come to be. What I'd like most though, is not having to worry about money, ever.

Quoted. For. Absolute. Truth. Freshwacka - Shut the [bleep] up. Nobody cares.

It's depressing to realize how rarely stingray attacks happen, and it happened to him in the worst place. It's like winning the lottery of death. It's really hard to believe how unlucky he was. :(

I once wanted to stay awake so naturally I thought about getting some coffee. I don't like drinking it though, so I thought I'd eat some. It tasted very very crap but it kept me awake very well.

It saddened me a lot hearing this. R.I.P

^Not true what you say about RS and lag/graphics. RS manages to be both laggy, and have bad graphics at the same time since it's java. I'd say they are demanding on the same level, since RS doesn't use your video card, only your CPU/memory. You can play WoW even if your CPU is outdated, and have a 30$+ graphics card (combined with 512MB+ ram, though RS needs the same at least). RS was not running smoothly on my 2.0 GHz machine (with 512MB ram). About the 56k... Have you tried playing RS with 56K? It's craptastic. Plus, who uses 56k these days anyway? and why would you want to? You say RS runs on linux. Great for linux users, but I'm using windows as well as pretty much anyone who plays games (Jagex' reasoning on choosing Java for RS is well poor). The installation of WoW does suck, but the community is better. Game development in RS is slow as hell, I checked it after I quit. Blizzard may be slow, but Jagex manages to be slower. To sum things up: if you're on 56k, got a seriously outdated comp and want to play an MMORPG that will surely work on your comp (albeit badly), go RS. If you can shell out 50$ + 15$ a month and got a half decent comp go WoW.

Blue107: Let me start by saying I've read a lot of your posts. You are ignorant and your posts containt so much crap and misinformation they're hardly worth replying to, but I'll do anyway. What a useless, dumb, comment (surprise surprise :shock: ). There are people who play tens of hours a day as there are people who play a few hours a month. :wall: WoW is a game where you can play a few hours a week and have fun. I know I did, I only got to level 53 but played for a year and it was good fun. You get most of your abilities after playing for a bit so you know what's the class is like and change it if you wish. Generalizing and saying everyone who plays WoW is a "super nerd" is as idiotic as you are. Yeah, you'd know all about the game after playing for a week, right? :roll: First of all the servers are all seperated, so once they open a new one all chars on that server start from level 1, and there are no 60. About "getting to the top" you can do it in 6 months if you want, since after you're level 60 there's only better armor to be gotten (and getting to 60 isn't that difficult). In RS it would take, what, half a decade? WTF is majurity? I played alongside people from all age groups, so you're wrong again. Yeah, criticize people in this thread who played the game and can actually comment about it while you played for a week. Nope, not hypocritical at all. QFT

Yes. I only shave my face, and that's only if I can be bothered.

I played RS, quit and started playing WoW and then quit that too. WoW was infinitely a better game. There are tradeskills in WoW, but they are a minor part of the game, unlike RS. This game revolves purely around combat - and it's way more fun than RS where combat consists of right clicking attack and eating sharks. The WoW community is way better than RS as well. I was shocked at first by how friendly the people are. Often when I asked for directions a person volunteered to take me there, or help me on a quest, or do a low level instance (= dungeon) with me while they gain nothing. As well as the friendly community WoW offers guild and team support, and you can easily communicate with your guild mates and teammates. WoW is definitely the better game if you can afford it.

Shopping sucks. I hate wasting money on crap I don't need. I guess it would be alright if it were someone else's money.

More gameplay? LOL. The PS3 has very little exclusive titles, and many will be shared with the Wii and the 360. Bluray changes nothing (besides the price). The PS3 lost with that 'risk'. The PS3 is going to be the next Gamecube. It's pretty much set to fail already, and developers are deserting it like a sinking ship, in favour of the Wii. I'd imagine 'older' audience (as in more mature) would prefer substance over form. That's not to say the Wii has bad graphics, because it doesn't. It outdoes the original Xbox which is pretty good. Maybe that's why the PS3 fails. If you're gonna buy a PS3 for 600$ you deserve it. :) You're also contradicting yourself by saying you don't want to play "GAMES YOU PLAYED IN THE 90S OMG" and in the next line admitting the Wii will be revolutionary.

You're right. I said it earlier in this thread that I avoid smoke when I can.

I remember seeing a hilarious Guild Wars ad on gamefaqs.com, which featured a (real) poll asking people which was the better game: Guild Wars, WoW, or The Sims Online (I think). WoW won with 50% of the votes. :lol:

Other than the amazing line up of launch titles such as Zelda and Metroid, not to mention the unique, new, interesting controls, and the affordable price you're right. No wait, you're still wrong. Do you mean the DS? I had both, sold the PSP. The DS is cheaper, more fun to play. The PSP is a gimmick. Here's a funny vid of the PS3 controller being bashed by a PS magazine ( :lol: ) :

Nintendo didn't make this, therefore you fail. Are you trying to look ignorant on purpose or something? Nintendo will sell more Wii consoles than Sony will sell PS3s, btw. You reminds me of the second oldest, high ranked bash quote: http://www.bash.org/?16 :lol:

I don't claim to have read that. I briefly read some parts, and it seems BS to me, especially after all the reports that were based on the 1993 one. In addition to that, there are plenty of studies done that refute it, like the one on the site I gave you.

Yes, runesmithie, I know that. :) It's still not true. Read: http://www.davehitt.com/facts/epa.html

Cool. A list of false facts.

Inventing words is fun. :lol:

Yep You're entitled to be wrong. :D

You're a hero. :| Second hand smoking is nearly harmless, and if you didn't want to be near a smoker you could go elsewhere. Can you be anymore dramatic than that? Maybe you should learn something from them. LOL. :? I don't hate you. I don't even know you, but you deserved what you got. Taunting the person like you did is just asking to be hit. I am not a smoker by the way, I don't like smoke and try not to be where I see someone smoking.

Haha, I'd punch you as well.

That's utter BS, and I can tell you that as a jewish Israeli.

That guy's a (bad) joke and nothing more. "Wipe Israel off the map" :lol: I'd like to see him try that. We'd send a nuke right up his tailpipe.

Dunno if these stories are true or not, but I feel embarrassed being a human seeing how some can stoop this low, anyway. :? :evil: