The Dark Lord

Okay, I'll admit that I was being an [wagon]. Sexual appeal has part of a relationship. I wouldn't want someone that would repulse me or make me feel uncomfortable. Although I am not shallow and am a little leany on that subject. I wouldn't really care to catch an STD (especially a dangerous one) or turns out my wife would not be able to have children. (Although the latter doesn't necessarily mean that I would end the relationship. Things could still work out.) I can think of at least one way to get someone pregnant without catching an STD from them (no sexual contact with them at all). I wouldn't want someone that is fat/has very unhealthy habits such as smoking (more than just the moderation, I'm talking about smoking to the point where it can cause cancer and the such) or has a habit of getting drunk, etc. If they cannot take care of themselves or are not responsible enough, how can I expect them to help take care of my children? Would it be a good environment for my children if they're neglected by one parent or that one parent influences me and my children in a negative manner? Sexual pleasure still isn't that important at all to me. For the record, if orgasms mean so much to you, there are special devices that INCREASE it. If you want it to be really intense, just go get that special neurosurgery. Again, that can be worked out as well.

So what if someone doesn't measure up to your standards sexually? (Yes you scream out in pleasure as they're screwing you, yet it's not "good enough.") Oh my God! His penis is 2 CM shorter than what you wanted! Get over it. Are you going to just keep on trying and getting disappointed or are you going to just suck it up and realize that life's a [bleep] and you don't always get things how you perfectly want them? Oh and is being romantic immoral?

How is it wrong to oppress people and keep them ignorant while using them as puppets? Can you provide any proof that this act is immoral? After all, morals are human-defined and are not written in stone.

Walking does a lot more than people think. You can burn more calories in the long run and conserve more energy.

I'd say 1-2 pounds a week is about average for people that lose weight. Yeah, the 500 cal. a day thing would work, but A) it's not healthy on the body in the long run. B) If you only do that and don't exercise, you'll just gain it back once you get to your ideal weight and eat normally again. I used to only consume 600 a day, but that left me hungry, so I increased it to 800-1000 a day (still below what it probably should be, but I have no hunger).

No joke. I have seen this 70 year old man that waited to get married until that age and he saved himself until marriage still. Freakin' idiot. Screw religion. I refuse to wait until then to get A) married B) sex.

You can seriously hurt yourself by not eating breakfast.

If you reduce your caloric intake to 500 calories a day, you should lose 1 pound a week automatically. When I diet, I reduce it to 600-800 a day and exercise. I exercise for about an hour a day. That doesn't include the walks I take every now and then and additional exercise from sports. Somehow I can live off 600-800 cal a day and not really be hungry at all, although I heard it can have some drawbacks on the heart for a prolonged period of time. I wouldn't reccomend it. It's just something that works for me. Then after you lose the weight, consume about 1500 cal. a day and exercise regularly (daily). TIP: DON'T be an idiot and try methamphetamine to lose weight, okay?

Amen.

Oh ok.

Why? It's still sex - just no help. So, if it was done before marriage, would it be wrong because in a sense it's "pre-marital sex."

Korskin didn't answer my question.

Not being shallow FTW!

If this freaks you out, Kors. Three girls called me at 4AM and offered me food sex. ------- Okay, do you think masturbation is wrong outside a marriage? It's another form of sex. Also every guy I know does it, possibly including you.

Yeah, that just about answers my view on this subject.

That's how you trick a hooker.

Oh noes! We have to ejaculate inside our brother's wife or we will be punished by God? Oh damn. I don't have a brother so I'm screwed! Isn't there like another verse that said if you masturbate (AKA jack off) and you ejaculate and it gets on the floor, you could be damned or something?

I'd have to say that my strangest dream was when I went through an entire day in my dream, just to find out that I had to repeat it all when I woke up.

If you weren't attracted to each other, why would you have sex in the first place or be in a relationship at all for that matter?

Just wondering, how would saying "If he's not able to make me extremely pleased during sex, then I can never love him and he's worthless to me. I don't give a [bleep]." not sound bad? All fine and dandy if they sleep together before marriage, but why should sex be the decisive factor whether or not she'll love him? Also, my uncle was victim to women like that. The [bleep]y [bleep] got tired of him (They were married for a few years.) one day and said "I don't love you anymore." and left him. Right after she moved out, she just so happened to have a boyfriend and she got pregnant a few weeks later with her boyfriend's child. I hate all people like that. There was NOTHING wrong with my uncle. He was a good man and a caring father. Now, he has to go with the pain of not having his children with him. (That [bleep] has them. Both children like him more than her.) By the way, that woman wanted to abort their second child (now a 3 year old girl) because she didn't want her, but my uncle did. At least they didn't get an abortion.

Now I remember some spots of color while trying to meditate. It happens frequently to me when I have my eyes shut, even when I'm not trying to meditate. It's a lot like when you stare at a bright light for a while and then close your eyes. Except there were no bright lights to cause this when I try to meditate. The visuals are fun and often it seems like you're going through a tunnel.

May I ask how you have come to that conclusion? "You don't buy a car before you take a test drive". The only function of a car is to drive. Thus saying that you wouldn't marry someone before having sex by using that analogy implies that the only function of your spouse is to sexually satisfy you. Hence the shallow comment. I have to agree with Insane on this one. Also it sounds like you're implying that you won't love someone unless they are really good sexually. If they don't satisfy you as much as you would like (sexually), then they are worthless to you. "If he can't make me squeal in delight, then I don't love him."

Let me reask this question. How do you feel about pre-teens/teens having sex?

There's another part to this, but I'm not sure if I should post it because there's a lot of swearing (although funny as hell) and some people might be offended. Damn it takes all the fun. Gaylords.

Wow. Legolas finally came out of the closet.