acenator

Well, then, we find ourselves in agreement (don't you love it when you think you're arguing one thing and another thinks you're arguing another and then you either end up agreeing with each other on both things or those 'two' things end up being the same thing and you actually agree, but the wording threw everyone off? :lol: ). Although I would like to add the fact that Jagex really only plans for every 50th quest to be awesome and just releases the rest (whether they're awesome or not) as they become ready for release. However, even in planning for the 50th quest to be awesome, I'm sure they don't just say "Hey this quest we got here that's going to be done on [insert approximate date here] needs to be the next 50th quest. Go make up some stupid quests to make sure it can be so." Rather, it would make more sense that they would say (months, if not over a year, before any projected date for the next 50th), "Hey, we're coming up on the next 50th slot, and are currently set to have the [insert a multiple of 50 - 1 here]th quest out on [insert approximate date here]. Let's get to work on an awesome quest that we should be able to get done in time to be the next 50th quest."

Right, and this is where the filler quests come in to push WGS up to 150. But as we can all see, that isn't what they did, so we know they didn't do that. Make sense? You pretty much just stated the obvious. If that wasn't what you were trying to do, then I would also like to add that it isn't likely that any of said filler quests were near completion when WGS came out and would have created a 49 day jump between quests with the two quests at either end being the very holiday quests that may or may not actually count as 'true' quests (if you don't count them, then the gap would have been over 3 months without WGS in there).

BloodRayne - 9 Lemons - 18 Jack Thomson - 0 Randomness - 31 Okay, now whoever posts next gets to replace Jack Thomson with whatever they want. Leave the rest just as they including the points each one has left.* *Just to clarify the rules as sestablished on page 1 and verified on page 2.

Here's where this thread belongs: Forum Games (You can report your own thread and ask that it be moved in the text-box (I forget the actual titel of it)). If you want, here's the thread istolethepie mentioned.

They supposedly have another totally epic one (that was) close to release, but then ran into some technical difficulties a little while before Chosen Commander (which is, as you probably know, the 150th quest when counting holiday 'quests') came out. Yeah, but my point still stands. Until Jagex releases the planned 150th quest, I don't think we should assume that WGS is better than it or vice versa. Also, I don't find it very logical to hold back WGS several months just so that it could be #150 when it was ready for release and there was another potentially epic quest in the makings and in line to be ready (as far as they could tell at that point in time) for release when it came time for quest #150.

BloodRayne - 9 Lemons - 18 Jack Thomson - 7 Randomness - 31

That dude with the face who's always at that one place. What is the "highest good?"

Granted. However, it somehow eats some anti-deppressants, goes crazy, and kills you. I wish rules were perfectly understandable for everyone.

BloodRayne - 9 Lemons - 18 Jack Thomson - 7 Randomness - 33 Randomness has gotten a little too safe for my liking.

Because they're so purty. Why don't I like it when people follow the rules exactly like they're supposed to?

I don't think you read them very well: you're only supposed to replace the one that was eliminated. Not come up with four new ones altogether. Too bad, I kept the champion, just GO GO GO! Dun maek me s@d Lemons - 10 Jack Thomson - 9 Blood Rayne - 9 Randomness - 10 You're also supposed to leave the other choices where they were. Check page two for an example of how it all works. Oh, and I can't help but make you sad since I'm a goody-two-shoes who can't stand it when people don't follow the rules exactly. 8-) BloodRayne - 9 Lemons - 18 Jack Thomson - 8 Randomness - 34

I don't think you read them very well: you're only supposed to replace the one that was eliminated. Not come up with four new ones altogether.

BloodRayne - 9 Lemons - 18 Randomness - 34 Ultimate Frisbee - 10 Because you failed to reread the first post to find out, I thought I'd go ahead and do so myself. :thumbsup:

Because the witch that weighed the same as a duck, which floats like wood and means that said witch was made of wood, said so.

Captain Falcon - 1 BloodRayne - 9 Lemons - 17 Randomness - 34

Definition. Why do people lie?

By not smashing it to bits. 8-) What is the definition of "computer?"

Granted. They now have absolutely no packaging and get eaten by bugs and/or touched by the hands of random people who walk by said delicious candy. I wish the people running the U.S. government were honest, knew what they were doing, and always did what was right for the country and not for their own pockets/egos.

Captain Falcon - 3 BloodRayne - 9 Lemons - 17 Randomness - 34

What prompted me to go back and find where I had asked that very same question, quote my asking of said question and then quote the folling person's answer to said question?

Captain Falcon - 3 BloodRayne - 9 Lemons - 17 Randomness - 34

Granted. However, since nobody has invented said "lazur" and you can therefore neither charge nor shoot one. I wish I had an unlimited supply of oil that I could draw on at whatever rate I wanted to that would allow me to control the oil markets.

Captain Falcon - 5 BloodRayne - 9 Lemons - 17 Randomness - 34