Satenza Posted March 14, 2007 Share Posted March 14, 2007 I think 3 pages of arguing whats truth and what's knowledge is enough, boys and girls. Jesus. It's a perfectly valid discussion, and a breath of fresh air from all the religious ones that rattle around. As well as having a deeper relevance to the validity of science too, so i can't see what your fuss is about. With so many trees in the city you could see the spring coming each day until a night of warm wind would bring it suddenly in one morning. Sometimes the heavy cold rains would beat it back so that it would seem that it would never come and that you were losing a season out of your life. But you knew that there would always be the spring as you knew the river would flow again after it was frozen. When the cold rains kept on and killed the spring, it was as though a young person had died for no reason. In those days though the spring always came finally but it was frightening that it had nearly failed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest XplsvBam Posted March 14, 2007 Share Posted March 14, 2007 I think 3 pages of arguing whats truth and what's knowledge is enough, boys and girls. Jesus. It's a perfectly valid discussion, and a breath of fresh air from all the religious ones that rattle around. As well as having a deeper relevance to the validity of science too, so i can't see what your fuss is about. Agreed. Let's try to sum it up and actually accomplish something from this discussion. Knowledge: Knowledge can be truth. Example it is true to us to justify the difference between male and female. It is possible that it isn't true but us as humans are limited to validate that which we can touch or observe. So truth to us can be knowledge. The only reason I am compromising on this is because it is possible that we have stumbled upon the truth. Truth: Something that can't be determined by humans but can be agreed upon in certain aspects and perspectives. I think from these views of knowledge and truth we can agree that science is validated only when its viewed upon in the same perspective. Is this good or did I totally miss the target? If you want to add anything try not to encourage more tedious discussion. But if you do its ok. Discussion is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now