TIRANNT

[pault]

You have still failed to give any factual evidence to support the idea that the US will attack Iran by the end of April. What a surprise.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I want to show that a war is possible and planned, not that it will happen. The pieces are in place.

[Intarweb]

 

You have still failed to give any factual evidence to support the idea that the US will attack Iran by the end of April. What a surprise.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I want to show that a war is possible and planned, not that it will happen. The pieces are in place.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry. Your first post is horribly misleading. You should be hung for blatant deception.

[Tigra00]

 

 

You have still failed to give any factual evidence to support the idea that the US will attack Iran by the end of April. What a surprise.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I want to show that a war is possible and planned, not that it will happen. The pieces are in place.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry. Your first post is horribly misleading. You should be hung for blatant deception.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I don't know of any place in the world where "deception" is punishable by violent death... :-#

[Continuum]

 

On the plus side, I visited a nuclear bomb proof bunker in York today, left over from the cold war with my history class. So if the worst happens, you know where i'll be for the 30 days it takes most ICBM's half life to get to safe background levels :D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

there is no such thing as a nuclear bomb proof bunker. you can get relatively close, but a direct hit will kill just about anything that isnt classified at this point. personally I think we should attack Iran, not to occupy them as we did in iraq, but just to show them who's boss. from the looks of it however, I would bet the people to pull the trigger on iran would be either Isreal, as they hate Iran, or the UK for taking those hostages.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ever heard of NORAD, hmm?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We did attack Iraq. You see, once another nation conquers another, they're supposed to either keep the land or set up a new government, usually the former. You wanted us to attack Iraq and then go away? What would be the point? Just to "show them who's boss"? Do you realize how pissed off the entire world is about Iraq?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

They didn't kidnap the UK troops, they detained them. The UK troops illegally entered Iran, they're not being held hostage. Then Israel has the whole Muslim world pissed off (AKA Middle East), who are fighting each other, because Israel has nuclear weapons and lots of Western allies.

[pompey_spud]

 

On the plus side, I visited a nuclear bomb proof bunker in York today, left over from the cold war with my history class. So if the worst happens, you know where i'll be for the 30 days it takes most ICBM's half life to get to safe background levels :D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

there is no such thing as a nuclear bomb proof bunker. you can get relatively close, but a direct hit will kill just about anything that isnt classified at this point.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well, nuclear bomb proof from at least 10 miles from the centre of the blast, that's why the bunker is 15 miles from the city centre

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

They didn't kidnap the UK troops, they detained them. The UK troops illegally entered Iran, they're not being held hostage. Then Israel has the whole Muslim world pissed off (AKA Middle East), who are fighting each other, because Israel has nuclear weapons and lots of Western allies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actually, we have tons and tons of evidence showing we were at least 2k yards inside the Iraq border. Things like GPS positionings and local witnesses. Iran are completely in the wrong and have practically admitted it themselves by their actions.

[Continuum]

Well, alrighty then.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think I heard from "Mail Call!" that NORAD has a 70% chance of surviving an attack by nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. Put together or separately, I don't know.

[pault]

Actually, we have tons and tons of evidence showing we were at least 2k yards inside the Iraq border. Things like GPS positionings and local witnesses. Iran are completely in the wrong and have practically admitted it themselves by their actions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actually the border is completely ambiguous and has been for a long time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is no agreed maritime boundary between Iraq and Iran in the Persian Gulf. Until the current mad propaganda exercise of the last week, nobody would have found that in the least a controversial statement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let me quote, for example, from that well known far left source Stars and Stripes magazine, October 24 2006.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

'Bumping into the Iranians canÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢t be helped in the northern Persian Gulf, where the lines between Iraqi and Iranian territorial water are blurred, officials said.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"No maritime border has been agreed upon by the two countries," Lockwood said.'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That is Royal Australian Navy Commodore Peter Lockwood. He is the Commander of the Combined Task Force in the Northern Persian Gulf.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... cleId=5229