Toad Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomdavies90 Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 lol funny, i give it 0/10 for spelling 0/10 for actual graphics 8/10 for funniness EDIT: 1/10 for graphics because you gave it a border Sig by me.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toad Posted April 13, 2007 Author Share Posted April 13, 2007 lol funny, i give it 0/10 for spelling 0/10 for actual graphics 8/10 for funniness EDIT: 1/10 for graphics because you gave it a border no offense its a text sig, only way it would have worked.. thrown in images and stuff would it have worked? NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeonardMart Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 its a text sig but even text sigs can be interesting for gods sake. its funny but waay too boring and empty Click my main sig to see my fakes :D Proud to be Mexican, yay! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toad Posted April 13, 2007 Author Share Posted April 13, 2007 its a text sig but even text sigs can be interesting for gods sake. its funny but waay too boring and empty Seriously, you try it with images, etc etc.. it wouldnt work.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeonardMart Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 its not necesarily images, use those colored backgrounds used normally in render sigs Click my main sig to see my fakes :D Proud to be Mexican, yay! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toad Posted April 13, 2007 Author Share Posted April 13, 2007 its not necesarily images, use those colored backgrounds used normally in render sigs No because its meant to be simple eg when you see a typo in a tabloid do you see rendered backgrounds..? No, i cant even read the text in your sig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terley Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 typography can say as much as any image, I think you've got the right way of thinking but I agree you could experiment more with how you go about this. I wouldn't say just plop a render into the background, but think outside the box.. A good way to look at this would be to actually type it on a typewriter, print it out and take a high quality picture of the result. you could also mess around with the line spacing, don't have it perfectly dead centered.. Having image/text slightly above the center is somehow easier on the eye, especially on display. I quickly made an edit, probably a bit OTT on the back image, I know it wasn't your intention but I do think being a bit more creative could be to it's advantage. Just a suggestion. I like the idea tho, keep it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoidnerd Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 typography can say as much as any image, I think you've got the right way of thinking but I agree you could experiment more with how you go about this. I wouldn't say just plop a render into the background, but think outside the box.. A good way to look at this would be to actually type it on a typewriter, print it out and take a high quality picture of the result. you could also mess around with the line spacing, don't have it perfectly dead centered.. Having image/text slightly above the center is somehow easier on the eye, especially on display. I quickly made an edit, probably a bit OTT on the back image, I know it wasn't your intention but I do think being a bit more creative could be to it's advantage. Just a suggestion. I like the idea tho, keep it up. better if no boarder and the binding holes were transparent My Myspace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misterxman Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 I know you probably ment for it to look unpleasing to the eye with that white background, but Terley's edit is pretty good too Pixel sigs by me.Pixel Art Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomdavies90 Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 lol funny, i give it 0/10 for spelling 0/10 for actual graphics 8/10 for funniness EDIT: 1/10 for graphics because you gave it a border no offense its a text sig, only way it would have worked.. thrown in images and stuff would it have worked? NO i was only joking..i only made that edit because i always see people on these forums go, 8/10 give it a border and it'll be better, yeah it is a bit plain, but it's still good, Terley's edit is great as well Sig by me.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Eggz Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 It's to big Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeBoab Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 typography can say as much as any image, I think you've got the right way of thinking but I agree you could experiment more with how you go about this. I wouldn't say just plop a render into the background, but think outside the box.. A good way to look at this would be to actually type it on a typewriter, print it out and take a high quality picture of the result. you could also mess around with the line spacing, don't have it perfectly dead centered.. Having image/text slightly above the center is somehow easier on the eye, especially on display. I quickly made an edit, probably a bit OTT on the back image, I know it wasn't your intention but I do think being a bit more creative could be to it's advantage. Just a suggestion. I like the idea tho, keep it up. better if no boarder and the binding holes were transparent if its sitting on a table well... who the hell has a transparent table? My photobucket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now