Nice shot, Jem, you and Mercifull can thank yourselves for pushing me in this direction. :boohoo:

 

You know the rest of the post beside this little part was a good, but it's really awful to blame someone else that your opinion was changed because of them. It just shows you can't generate your own opinions with reading other users opinions. I don't mean to be cruel, but that's just how it looks to everyone else basically.

 

 

 

Also pressing the page down button can resolve this, this suggestion is pretty much obsolete.

 

I know it can resolve this, it just seems easier to be redirected to where the topics are, rather than not being redirected at all. And changing that redirect link is just as easy as saying this suggestion is obsolete.

You're lucky this is only a forum.

 

 

 

Please for your own personal safety, don't underestimate the dangers of a forum.

Still, though, I feel nudged in the direction I do because with how the points are presented, Jem's and Mercifull's attempts to shoot it down have an inverse effect by their overall aspects and nature. Just examine it, you will get what I mean. :thumbup:

 

So if I tell you that jumping off a cliff is bad for your health, but do it in a less than 100% comprehensible way, you'd jump off the cliff just because I didn't perfectly state why it's bad? Using logic like that in situations where it counts can get you killed. You're lucky this is only a forum.

 

Your analogy is way off base, Cruiser. No one could get me to jump off a cliff, no matter how hard they tried, even with reverse psychology. You are effectively trying to compare apples (Tip.It Forums with real people and such) to broccoli (Real Offline Forumless Life). At least find something better to compare with, okay? :

 

 

 

(And BTW, the "ROFL" pun is intentional. :P ... I'm laughing :lol: at the 'lack of IQ used' in your post. It is like you're 'banging your head off a wall' :wall: or something before you post, which I have to admit, that's mind-numbing.)

 

 

 

~Mr. Devnull

I know it can resolve this, it just seems easier to be redirected to where the topics are, rather than not being redirected at all. And changing that redirect link is just as easy as saying this suggestion is obsolete.

 

 

 

Ctrl + F is your friend.

 

Type in the name of your title and it should come up.

I know it can resolve this, it just seems easier to be redirected to where the topics are, rather than not being redirected at all. And changing that redirect link is just as easy as saying this suggestion is obsolete.

 

 

 

Ctrl + F is your friend.

 

Type in the name of your title and it should come up.

 

1. How would you know the title name?

 

2. Cntrl+F may not be as fast as scrolling(mind you redirecting is faster than scrolling, imo)

 

3. I don't even know why you said Control+F is my friend? :shame:

Your analogy is way off base, Cruiser. No one could get me to jump off a cliff, no matter how hard they tried, even with reverse psychology. You are effectively trying to compare apples (Tip.It Forums with real people and such) to broccoli (Real Offline Forumless Life). At least find something better to compare with, okay? :

 

 

 

It's the same basic logic (which you seem to lack most of the time). The meat of your reply was "You didn't explain your point well enough so I'm going with the opposite side", which I pointed out with the cliff example. Context has nothing to do with it. You did nothing to explain WHY you chose the opposite side other than basing it off not liking how someone else replied to the idea.

Your analogy is way off base, Cruiser. No one could get me to jump off a cliff, no matter how hard they tried, even with reverse psychology. You are effectively trying to compare apples (Tip.It Forums with real people and such) to broccoli (Real Offline Forumless Life). At least find something better to compare with, okay? :

 

It's the same basic logic (which you seem to lack most of the time). The meat of your reply was "You didn't explain your point well enough so I'm going with the opposite side", which I pointed out with the cliff example. Context has nothing to do with it. You did nothing to explain WHY you chose the opposite side other than basing it off not liking how someone else replied to the idea.

 

Argh, Cruiser, didn't you see what Jemathonical's post code and such looked like? Or the fact that Mercifull did not take into account most general PC users? Go read again, please. I've already explained the "Why I'm taking the other side of this issue"... It was due to anything but dislike.

 

 

 

<*Walks off with this confusingly stunned look on his face.*>

 

 

 

~Mr. Devnull