C & C please? :)

Not bad at all. ;) The first signature flows well, and has great text. I don't like the second design as much though, mainly due to the background. It seems to remind me of bubbles. #-o

the first one is real good, the color and effects really work

 

the second one not so much and could use some more blending in the background

C & C

 

Lol, i'm bored so i noticed you put down C&C wich would make it say constructive & critism ... :P i think it has suposed to be c/c or cc or something like that :P

 

 

 

Sorry for the stupid noticing...

^ It can also mean comments and/or criticism, so writing down C&C actually does make sense. :wink:

 

 

 

[/off-topicness]

 

 

 

Both signatures look pretty good, especially the first one. No real C/C on either, but you might want to make the text a bit less distracting by changing the layer's blending mode for example.

Am I the only one that thinks the second one is 10 times better?

 

The second one has a non distracting focal, a nice background.

 

The others looks like piled c4ds.

I've tried using different blending modes on the text layers. On the devil may cry sig, most of them woudl not show the text and the lighten etc blending modes made it wayyyy to bright.

 

 

 

Looking at the DMC now, I think it really needs improving.*

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for the comments anyway guys :thumbup:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Is there a way I can unflatten layers on Photoshop CS3 Extended?

 

*Is there a way I can unflatten layers on Photoshop CS3 Extended?

 

 

 

I don't think there is such a feature on any graphics program, but why did you flatten those layers in the first place? :o It's always a good idea to keep a copy of the .psd with all separate layers still there, just in case you need/want to edit something.

How do I get 1 copy .psd and 1 copy .jpg or whatever then?

Make a sig, save as .psd, then use the Save As... function to save another copy as a .jpg or whatever.

save as will make it a psd or pdd... most likely a psd...

 

save for web you can make it anything you want...

the first one is really good :thumbup:

(1) DMC sig, not that good. The colors are drab and boring, and I don't really like how you handled the focal point. I end up focusing on his wierd hand, where it would probably be better to (slightly!) blur his gun and hand while sharpening up a bit his face. If you want that as the focal, that is.

 

 

 

(2) It's better, and works pretty well. Still a fairly basic sig but it looks good although I would personally sharpen up the text just a tad.