Deltaer Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Dont think you got my point killer. Okay, got it hellrazer. [2010] Proud Member of Downfall[2004-2005] Former Leader of The Unbreakables, Former Member of Corruption, Former Member of 'The' Clan(...and Anarchy for a few weeks... shhh...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killerconvic Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Gladz got put in their place, gj TD. DI didn't crash, stop making excuses for being beaten. Even Finaltank admitted Gladz lost, and that DS only made an effect on the amount of TD who lived. Stop crying and admit defeat. Did you even read the topic? Cry me a river, please. :cry: We did admit defeat and on more than one occasion in this topic. Again, good war TD. Hope to do it again some time. Give DI hell. Gladz were crying in Edge about being beaten, why you'd want me to cry about my least favorite clan being beaten FAIRLY after talking all this game is not of my concern. And I didn't read the whole topic, because I don't care that much about the topic, I only care about the fact Gladz got put in their place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akanwar Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Congratulations TD. Gladz lost, TD won, bottom line. Maybe we can war again someday. And some people need to let up with all this trash talk about Gladz. For real.... grow up :? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killerconvic Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Dont think you got my point killer. Okay, got it hellrazer. I thought you were the one who posted the pic. There were a lot of people there to watch, what was TD supposed to do? Attack them and waste food, and lose a few people? As well as get disorganized? Or just let them sit there? Not really anything they can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M3tal_H3ad Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Grats TD :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memphus Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M3tal_H3ad Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 That's just as sad as saying u guys brang tmrd jagz and the DS were watching, Bibbleboy was filming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Species8472 Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 I want to address a few lingering issues: After much thought and clan discussion, we've invariably tied a few loose ends during our intraspective reflection, but also have uncovered a few new issues. First of all, the Gladiatorz wish to accept the defeat to The Dynasty. However, there are a couple clauses to that acceptance: 1.) It can be agreed upon that the many spectators situated side by side TD members was a diversion, whether it was intended or not. The Gladiatorz did not have such an advantage. Granted, during the war this proved to be a mutual disadvantage, but initially, while we charged them, we did not know who was TD and who was not. They knew who were Gladz. 2.)It can also be agreed upon that the spectators altered the circumstances surrounding the battle. They did not merely "spectate", but rather got involved. Filming? I guess attacking people makes for better footage. Whether he attacked TD or Gladz is irrelevant. He attacked one of us, and therefore affected the war. This was true of many other spectators. And also: Whether or not this was planned, I cannot say, and I'm sure we'll never get a clear answer to, but what we can ALL agree upon is that NEITHER side would want such a situation to even occur. It would rob them of a clean victory, as it has with TD. DS and TD claim that the spectators did not affect anything. They didn't help or hinder any side, they were merely spectators. I think from the pictures we can see that is not the case, whether either side wanted it that way or not. Spectators should not be allowed at wars. However, since DS and TD believe that spectators are inconsequential, I invite EVERYONE to spectate on thier mains, at every single subsequent war that either clan has! DS and TD won't say anything, because they don't think it matters. :roll: But I'm sure they'll say something, because deep down inside they know that spectators alter the battle field. In our clan, we are divided on this. A good portion of the clan wants to spectate at TD and DS wars, and cause the same havoc and detriment that they have caused to us at our war. But then another portion of the clan doesn't want to. They say that we should take the higher ground, and treat people the way we want to be treated. And that, my friends is what my clan is all about. You guys might trash us. You guys might say we're noobs. But you know what? As long as there's a group of Gladiatorz that won't stoop down and dish out what we didn't like being dealt to us, we'll always remain a noble clan. And as for this picture: We are going to say this once more. Paladinwiz died at the war. TD can back us up. Paladinwiz died. He was in Lumbridge. He came back to Chaos Dwarves to fight against DI and DS He did not run from the war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ximmortalx Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Species, do you have any pictures of Bibbleboy attacking any TD or Gladz members? No you don't because there is none. He was attacking spectators. He even filmed the video and said he would upload it later. You don't need to lie about stuff and make excuses. Just accept your lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ximmortalx Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Species8472 Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killerconvic Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. It's pathetic that you're still accusing TD of cheating even though they didn't cheat, and your leader already accepted the loss. YOU LOST, GET BETTER, LEARN FROM YOUR MISTAKES, AND TRY AGAIN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ximmortalx Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Species8472 Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) I don't pick apart people's spelling/grammar at all. I only did it because I found it so incredibly ironical* (catcher in the rye reference... great book) that you call people "idiots", when you yourself are clearly lacking basic intelligence. And we aren't making excuses. We're stating the facts. Read my long post above. It has pictures! (for people like you who need such things to hold their attention) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killerconvic Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) I don't pick apart people's spelling/grammar at all. I only did it because I found it so incredibly ironical* (catcher in the rye reference... great book) that you call people "idiots", when you yourself are clearly lacking basic intelligence. And we aren't making excuses. We're stating the facts. Read my long post above. It has pictures! (for people like you who need such things to hold their attention) Someone's grammar/spelling in an informal environment is hardly an indicator of their intelligence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Species8472 Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) I don't pick apart people's spelling/grammar at all. I only did it because I found it so incredibly ironical* (catcher in the rye reference... great book) that you call people "idiots", when you yourself are clearly lacking basic intelligence. And we aren't making excuses. We're stating the facts. Read my long post above. It has pictures! (for people like you who need such things to hold their attention) Someone's grammar/spelling in an informal environment is hardly an indicator of their intelligence. In every single one of my posts, I related back to the TD/Gladz incident. Please refrain from steering this thread into another unrelated discussion on grammar/spelling "in an informal environment". This is the last I will respond to this issue of that one 'genius' calling my clan members "idiots", so please let's drop the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h3llr4zar_td Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 we went up alone, we did not bring DS ,DI and everyone that wanted to spectate, if it was Gladz defending, i m sure you guys would be in the same position as us, which is 50 spectators and 300 noobs running around while you waiting for us. i watched the zf vs di war, and they had exact same problem, so i did tell all TD not atk unless its a green caped. i dont no why Gladz members attacked spectators. i know Gladz have lots of inactives, but i m sure someone would have told them TD uses orange cape not pink skirts and bronze armors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killerconvic Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) I don't pick apart people's spelling/grammar at all. I only did it because I found it so incredibly ironical* (catcher in the rye reference... great book) that you call people "idiots", when you yourself are clearly lacking basic intelligence. And we aren't making excuses. We're stating the facts. Read my long post above. It has pictures! (for people like you who need such things to hold their attention) Someone's grammar/spelling in an informal environment is hardly an indicator of their intelligence. In every single one of my posts, I related back to the TD/Gladz incident. Please refrain from steering this thread into another unrelated discussion on grammar/spelling "in an informal environment". This is the last I will respond to this issue of that one 'genius' calling my clan members "idiots", so please let's drop the issue. Heh. Whatever, ignore the fact you're wrong. You lost the war, that's all that matters. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ximmortalx Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) I don't pick apart people's spelling/grammar at all. I only did it because I found it so incredibly ironical* (catcher in the rye reference... great book) that you call people "idiots", when you yourself are clearly lacking basic intelligence. And we aren't making excuses. We're stating the facts. Read my long post above. It has pictures! (for people like you who need such things to hold their attention) Someone's grammar/spelling in an informal environment is hardly an indicator of their intelligence. In every single one of my posts, I related back to the TD/Gladz incident. Please refrain from steering this thread into another unrelated discussion on grammar/spelling "in an informal environment". This is the last I will respond to this issue of that one 'genius' calling my clan members "idiots", so please let's drop the issue. Wow, you think I'm a genius. You truly are an idiot. :$ And I'm sorry I didn't crash this war like I did to the TD vs TR war. I thought some people might of actually thought I was crashing. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Species8472 Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) I don't pick apart people's spelling/grammar at all. I only did it because I found it so incredibly ironical* (catcher in the rye reference... great book) that you call people "idiots", when you yourself are clearly lacking basic intelligence. And we aren't making excuses. We're stating the facts. Read my long post above. It has pictures! (for people like you who need such things to hold their attention) Someone's grammar/spelling in an informal environment is hardly an indicator of their intelligence. In every single one of my posts, I related back to the TD/Gladz incident. Please refrain from steering this thread into another unrelated discussion on grammar/spelling "in an informal environment". This is the last I will respond to this issue of that one 'genius' calling my clan members "idiots", so please let's drop the issue. Wow, you think I'm a genius. You truly are an idiot. :$ And I'm sorry I didn't crash this war like I did to the TD vs TR war. I thought some people might of actually thought I was crashing. :( Wow. You took me seriously when I said you were a 'genius'. I included the little quotes to help people like you. But I guess my efforts were in vain. You really ARE a """""genius""""" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killerconvic Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) I don't pick apart people's spelling/grammar at all. I only did it because I found it so incredibly ironical* (catcher in the rye reference... great book) that you call people "idiots", when you yourself are clearly lacking basic intelligence. And we aren't making excuses. We're stating the facts. Read my long post above. It has pictures! (for people like you who need such things to hold their attention) Someone's grammar/spelling in an informal environment is hardly an indicator of their intelligence. In every single one of my posts, I related back to the TD/Gladz incident. Please refrain from steering this thread into another unrelated discussion on grammar/spelling "in an informal environment". This is the last I will respond to this issue of that one 'genius' calling my clan members "idiots", so please let's drop the issue. Wow, you think I'm a genius. You truly are an idiot. :$ And I'm sorry I didn't crash this war like I did to the TD vs TR war. I thought some people might of actually thought I was crashing. :( Wow. You took me seriously when I said you were a 'genius'. I included the little quotes to help people like you. But I guess my efforts were in vain. You really ARE a """""genius""""" I thought all your posts were about the war. :? Buy a sense of humor please. :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ximmortalx Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Wow. You took me seriously when I said you were a 'genius'. I included the little quotes to help people like you. But I guess my efforts were in vain. You really ARE a """""genius""""" No I didn't. I knew you were being sarcastic and so was I lol. I thought that was your last response to me. That sure lasted long (I'm being sarcastic by the way). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Species8472 Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) I don't pick apart people's spelling/grammar at all. I only did it because I found it so incredibly ironical* (catcher in the rye reference... great book) that you call people "idiots", when you yourself are clearly lacking basic intelligence. And we aren't making excuses. We're stating the facts. Read my long post above. It has pictures! (for people like you who need such things to hold their attention) Someone's grammar/spelling in an informal environment is hardly an indicator of their intelligence. In every single one of my posts, I related back to the TD/Gladz incident. Please refrain from steering this thread into another unrelated discussion on grammar/spelling "in an informal environment". This is the last I will respond to this issue of that one 'genius' calling my clan members "idiots", so please let's drop the issue. Wow, you think I'm a genius. You truly are an idiot. :$ And I'm sorry I didn't crash this war like I did to the TD vs TR war. I thought some people might of actually thought I was crashing. :( Wow. You took me seriously when I said you were a 'genius'. I included the little quotes to help people like you. But I guess my efforts were in vain. You really ARE a """""genius""""" I thought all your posts were about the war. :? Buy a sense of humor please. :wink: I wish it wasn't under these circumstances that we've gotten to know eachother. You seem like a smart guy, and I assure you that I do in fact have a sense of humor :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killerconvic Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) I don't pick apart people's spelling/grammar at all. I only did it because I found it so incredibly ironical* (catcher in the rye reference... great book) that you call people "idiots", when you yourself are clearly lacking basic intelligence. And we aren't making excuses. We're stating the facts. Read my long post above. It has pictures! (for people like you who need such things to hold their attention) Someone's grammar/spelling in an informal environment is hardly an indicator of their intelligence. In every single one of my posts, I related back to the TD/Gladz incident. Please refrain from steering this thread into another unrelated discussion on grammar/spelling "in an informal environment". This is the last I will respond to this issue of that one 'genius' calling my clan members "idiots", so please let's drop the issue. Wow, you think I'm a genius. You truly are an idiot. :$ And I'm sorry I didn't crash this war like I did to the TD vs TR war. I thought some people might of actually thought I was crashing. :( Wow. You took me seriously when I said you were a 'genius'. I included the little quotes to help people like you. But I guess my efforts were in vain. You really ARE a """""genius""""" I thought all your posts were about the war. :? Buy a sense of humor please. :wink: I wish it wasn't under these circumstances that we've gotten to know eachother. You seem like a smart guy, and I assure you that I do in fact have a sense of humor :) Pm me with your MSN then :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Species8472 Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Whether or not TD's cheating affected the outcome is irrelevant. They still cheated, and that's all that matters. If they could have won without bringing DI and DS and coming back from Lumbridge, then they should have done it that way. But because they cheated, they are losers in my eyes. It's like attempting to murder someone but failing. You still get charged and punished, whether the attempt actually had any affect or not. So re-war TD? You honestly think TD would bring DI to help them cheat. No one is going to be punished until you present some evidence. You're an idiot. Just accept your lose. First of all, don't call people idiots when you're saying "accept your lose". Lose is a verb. You can't accept it. You can accept a noun, but you can't accept a verb. It's like saying "accept your die", instead of "accept your death." Or, "accept your promote" rather than "accept your promotion". You said it twice. That makes you a certified idiot. Second of all, we already accepted our loss, or "lose" as you so eloquently put it. Bibbleboy may have attacked solely spectators, however we can all agree that it detracts from the overall situation of the war. I don't think ANY clan, regardless of what they say (such as DS), would want other people fighting IN the battlefield other than the two warring clans. Could you imagine if the Gladz decided to fight... ZF during the TD and DI war? In the same place? TD and DI would get angry. And rightfully so. Sorry Mom, I didn't know this was English class. :wink: I'll say accept your lose again since you're so bent about spelling. Keep making excuses as to why you guys lost. Only around 40 TD died? Good work 8) I don't pick apart people's spelling/grammar at all. I only did it because I found it so incredibly ironical* (catcher in the rye reference... great book) that you call people "idiots", when you yourself are clearly lacking basic intelligence. And we aren't making excuses. We're stating the facts. Read my long post above. It has pictures! (for people like you who need such things to hold their attention) Someone's grammar/spelling in an informal environment is hardly an indicator of their intelligence. In every single one of my posts, I related back to the TD/Gladz incident. Please refrain from steering this thread into another unrelated discussion on grammar/spelling "in an informal environment". This is the last I will respond to this issue of that one 'genius' calling my clan members "idiots", so please let's drop the issue. Wow, you think I'm a genius. You truly are an idiot. :$ And I'm sorry I didn't crash this war like I did to the TD vs TR war. I thought some people might of actually thought I was crashing. :( Wow. You took me seriously when I said you were a 'genius'. I included the little quotes to help people like you. But I guess my efforts were in vain. You really ARE a """""genius""""" I thought all your posts were about the war. :? Buy a sense of humor please. :wink: I wish it wasn't under these circumstances that we've gotten to know eachother. You seem like a smart guy, and I assure you that I do in fact have a sense of humor :) Pm me with your MSN then :wink: Lovefest anyone? Lol I've had bad experiences with giving out my msn (viruses etc), but please feel free to talk to me in game: Flaresword *edit* going to bed now so I'm not logged on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts