August 12, 200817 yr Whats the best way to get my cookin lvl to 99. Im losing 60k every 1000 raw lobbies and cooking them then selling.
August 13, 200817 yr You can try monks. If you have the cooking gauntlets, you can try sharks from 94-99, but the gaunts don't work on monks. ~ Proud Father ~ Proud (Currently Deployed) Army National Guardsmen ~ Proud Lakota ~ Retired Tip.It Crew ~
August 13, 200817 yr for me the easiest way to get there is fishing my own food. i fished 60k feathers so i got a lot of fishing xp and i can get the cooking xp now. 99 cooking achieved on december 7th 2008
August 13, 200817 yr To get 99 cooking with lobsters you would need to cook 87,380 more lobsters. Assuming you lose 60 gp per lobster that you cook you would spend 5,242,800 gp. You could also cook 44,965 lobsters until level 94, when you stop burning sharks with cooking gauntlets. Then you would need to cook 24,237 sharks for 99. You would only end up cooking 69,202 fish so it would take about 79% as long as cooking just lobsters. Assuming you lose 60 gp per lobster that you cook you will spend 2,697,900 gp on lobsters. Assuming you buy raw sharks at current median market price (998 gp) and sell cooked sharks at current median market price (818) you will lose 180 gp per shark that you cook. This means that you will spend 4,362,660 on sharks. So total, you would spend 7,060,560 gp. This is 1,817,760 more gp than it would cost you to cook lobsters all the way to level 99. Assuming that you can cook 1000 fish an hour, getting 99 cooking just on lobsters will take about 87 hours. If you switch to sharks at level 94, it will only take about 69 hours. So switching to sharks at level 94 will save you 18 hours. In these 18 saves hours, you could earn enough money to make switching to sharks worth it if you can make over 100,986 gp per hour. Final result: cook lobsters all the way to 99 if you make less than 100k an hour, but if you can make more than 100k an hour switch to sharks at level 94. "We will certainly not be gaining money or members with this update. Instead, we are doing this for the good of the game, which is as dear to our hearts as it is to you."- JAGEX, December 13, 2007
Create an account or sign in to comment