two birds with one stone...

[iceharwk]

well here it is lvl 80 att (4th skill 80+) and 100 combat for the 2nd time, yep its not one of those summoning boosted ones (like my first :oops: ) its the proper deal :D

 

 

 

 

 

 

i know 110 is the new 100 but, 100 f2p combat is impresive to me

 

 

 

rate/hate

[STiSkill]

Congrats! :thumbsup:

[hitman76]

lol ill be getting that in about 50k xp

 

 

 

nice job, always ftw to be f2p triple digits =D>

[ajk822]

Yeah anyone with 100 combat from summoning just means that that person realizes it's good to train one of the best skills in the game, so will people please stop saying "100 combat the proper way". Go duel someone the same combat and one has summoning and the other doesn't in a food fight. I'll guess that the one with summoning will win.

[Obtaurian]

Congratulations! You can't use a beast of burden to be much more efficient, you can't use a Bunyip to save money and time on Slayer tasks, you can't beat another someone your level who uses Summoning. Your efficiency as a player is vastly inferior to a level 50 with 52 Summoning.

 

 

 

2/10 for bragging about not raising a skill.

 

 

 

9/10 because you're proud of your 100 combat.

[SythenRs]

The only time it would be good to have 100 combat without Summoning would be if you were pure f2p.

 

 

 

But 100 combat one way or another is nice. 5/10

[meme79]

6/10

 

-3 for no summoning

 

 

 

3/10

 

 

 

grads anywyas, now train ur summon

[Str4lif3]

Congratulations! You can't use a beast of burden to be much more efficient, you can't use a Bunyip to save money and time on Slayer tasks, you can't beat another someone your level who uses Summoning. Your efficiency as a player is vastly inferior to a level 50 with 52 Summoning.

 

 

 

2/10 for bragging about not raising a skill.

 

 

 

9/10 because you're proud of your 100 combat.

 

 

 

[bleep]ing moron. Look at his sig, he got 61 summon.

[palas1]

Congratulations! You can't use a beast of burden to be much more efficient, you can't use a Bunyip to save money and time on Slayer tasks, you can't beat another someone your level who uses Summoning. Your efficiency as a player is vastly inferior to a level 50 with 52 Summoning.

 

 

 

2/10 for bragging about not raising a skill.

 

 

 

9/10 because you're proud of your 100 combat.

 

lol, what made you think he can't use an beast of burden and that he doesn't raise summoning?

 

anyways grats on 100 cb 8/10

[flowerboy]

Wow you guys are shallow minded.

 

 

 

He has summoning, 61 in fact.

 

 

 

He is proud of this accomplishment because he got 100 combat in f2p, meaning that his summoning didn't factor into the combat.

 

 

 

100 combat is nice man, keep going.

[alphakoldes]

I think most of you guys are looking for this thread: viewtopic.php?f=30&t=756958

 

 

 

ON topic: Congrats on the levels. :)

[Aussietroopa]

Some of you are pathetic, honestly. Summoning vs a non summoned player, both the same level, the person without summoning would win. Why? They hit harder, get hit less, and hit more often. Summoning is a good skill, but its far from a damn necessity. I'm 68 Summoning, but I dont use a familiar in a PvP environment. Why? It's completely useless in PvP, unless a) You use a Locust or B) You use a level 79+ Summoning Familiar. Summoning blow's in PvP before 79, admit it. The extra 10 combats You'd save from that is upto 40 Attack, Strength or Defence levels. Do you realise the difference between that? Sure you can eat my food. But I hit 3-7 more damage then you, far more often. Plus I'm not hit as much. Summoning rules in PvE, but not in PvP.